November 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: FtpClientUtil refactoring

by b_georges

Kurt, This is where we left it . I believe this is one way of doing it. The factory will return the corresponding implementation. So far I haven't implemented this logic, instead I am focusing to get the EdtFtpImpl and JschFtpImpl class working. [Your input is welcome though :-) ] The method responsible for this in the factory looks like this so far: | public static RemoteFileSystem getRemoteFileSystem(ConfigTree p_oP, boolean p_bConnect) | throws RemoteFileSystemException | { | try | { | // TODO get the implementation class from properties. | | //ConfigTree cfgTree = ConfigTree.fromInputStream((InputStream)new FileInputStream("ftp-esb-properties.xml")); | return new EdtFtpImpl(p_oP,p_bConnect); | } View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984873#3984873 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984873

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Internal Benchmarking] - Re: JBoss 4.0.4 + MySQL 5.0.17c Pro + SpecJ2004

by prakah

Hello All, I have able get around 45 JOPS for txRate of 30. The changes i have done is given below. 1. Run the test in two machines. | a. Machine 1: Only the JBoss AS with SPECjAppServer Application deployed | b. Machine 2: Emulator + MySQL + Driver. | 2. Create two databases, one for JMS and other one for EJB works. | | But i am getting "connection time out" errors in the driver. The error given is below. | | Error: Connection: IOException: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out (errno:238) | | I am not sure, whether this timeout has happened because of tomcat session time out or it is database timeout. | | Please provied me some suggestion, to solve this problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984861#3984861 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984861

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: onDemand handling and aspects

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I am not sure. All I know is that Adrian mentioned that the KernelControllerContextAware interface is a temporary solution View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984853#3984853 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984853

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - onDemand handling and aspects

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

For aspects like the jmx and jndi introductions that hook into the KernelControllerContextAware callbacks, who handles onDemand behavior? I believe Adrian indicated that these aspects really need to be honoring the onDemand behavior and not operating until the bean is requested. What is the callback that would have to be used in place of the KernelControllerContextAware interface? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984850#3984850 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984850

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Added JndiBinding aspect/annotation

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I added org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.aspects.jndi.JndiIntroduction and a org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.aspects.jndi.JndiBinding annotation to support binding a bean into jndi on the KernelControllerContextAware callbacks. | /** | * An annotation that indicates an object should be bound into JNDI | * | * @author Scott.Stark(a)jboss.org | * @version $Revision: 46386 $ | */ | @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) | @Target({ElementType.TYPE,ElementType.FIELD}) | public @interface JndiBinding | { | /** | * the name under which the binding will be located | * @return | */ | String name() ; | /** | * Optional additional aliases to also bind | * @return | */ | String[] aliases() default {}; | } | | <deployment xmlns="urn:jboss:bean-deployer:2.0"> | ... |  | <beanfactory name="JndiAdvice" class="org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.aspects.jndi.JndiIntroduction"> |  | <property name="env"> | <map class="java.util.Properties" keyClass="java.lang.String" valueClass="java.lang.String"> | <entry><key>java.naming.factory.initial</key><value>org.jboss.test.microcontainer.support.jndi.MockInitialContextFactory</value></entry> | </map> | </property> | </beanfactory> | | ... | See the org.jboss.test.microcontainer.test.JndiDecoratedTestCase and /aop-mc-int/src/resources/tests/org/jboss/test/microcontainer/test/JndiDecoratedTestCase.xml for an example. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984848#3984848 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984848

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: a jms message sending node type

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

jeff, why should the initial esb integration be done with JMS. I expected this to occur via the JBI binding component interface ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984829#3984829 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984829

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - static field replication in PojoCache

by ben.wang＠jboss.com

I am trying to scope out the requirement for the static field replication. Here are what I have: 1. Create a @Replicatable field annotation so user can annotate the POJO to designate the static field for replication, e.g., | @org.jboss.cache.pojo.annotation.PojoCacheable | public class POJO | { | @org.jboss.cache.pojo.annotation.Replicatble | public static int someStaticVar; | | ... | } | such that POJO.someStatic=10 will trigger the replication. 2. Only support the static variable of either Primitive or Serializable. I.e., can't support another "aspectized" POJO. 3. The fqn name for the static field varialbe is global and is known a priori, e.g., in the above case, someStaticVar will be stored under: /__JBoss_Static_/POJO/someStaticVar 4. The static variable will be stored under the cache during POJO initialization (even when no POJO has not been put into the cache yet!) 5. And finally, there can be only ONE PojoCache instance per VM! This is needed to follow the normal Java semantics. Furthermore, if we have multiple cache instances, which cache instance are we going to store the static variables under? Of course, the last requirement is more restrictive and more importantly make the unit testing difficult. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984816#3984816 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984816

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - JBoss 4.0.5GA has broken jboss-serialization.jar

by murtuza52

Have a look at this thread: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=94203 Replacing old jboss-serialization.jar file from older jboss version resolves the infinite org.jboss.serial.persister.RegularObjectPersister exception. Murtuza View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984809#3984809 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984809

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: Poor performance with test...

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

You are probably measuring classLoading time... You need to ignore first measuring... considering only steady time. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984800#3984800 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984800

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Possible optimization of CachedSetImpl

by genman

Done. The performance of Set is now about twice as good as List for adds. Iteration is about the same for either. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984797#3984797 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984797

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2006