December 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Going to pull the vfs packages into a separate project

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

Sorry, I didn't get a chance to test this with a JBoss instance after I committed it. Was in the process of doing that which is why I didn't add it to the repository, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994960#3994960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994960

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Valve on HAAspect

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : I have locally changed ValveAspect to use readWriteLocks... But I think using org.jboss.messaging.util.Valve would be a better mechanism. | | a parenthesis before starting (Valve is the same as creating a property failoverRunning on the Aspect, and if failoverRunning is true we will wait on notify until failover is finished. I just encapsulated such logic in a class instead of spread Objects and notifies on ValveAspect, so please do not compare it with java.util.concurrent or any other package like that) | | | Using readWriteLock will add synchronization into ValveAspect::invoke. Even readWriteLock requires synchronization while the use of Valve would minimize it. | How does the use of Valve minimise it? Valve still needs to be synchronised. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994953#3994953 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994953

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Going to pull the vfs packages into a separate project

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The problem is hasBeenModified() causing trashing of the cache due to the first call always returning false. I have updated this method to not return true when cachedLastModified is uninitialized and the startup time is back down to 14s. | public boolean hasBeenModified() throws IOException | { | boolean hasBeenModified = false; | long last = getLastModified(); | if (cachedLastModified != last) | { | hasBeenModified = cachedLastModified != 0; | cachedLastModified = last; | } | return hasBeenModified; | } | I have created a 2.0.0.Beta2 release of the vfs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994908#3994908 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994908

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: HsqlDbRealm as default security domain?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I would assume its due to the ejb timer service. The cache won't be flushed on undeploy as in general security domains are not local to a deployment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994891#3994891 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994891

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - HsqlDbRealm as default security domain?

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

I deployed a simple test ear on Branch_4_2 and found that it got associated with HsqlDbRealm. That seems odd. The ear is very straightforward. A webapp with a couple servlets and an ejb jar with one SLSB. Nothing is specified as being secured; there aren't even any jboss-specific deployment descriptors in the ear. I'm using this ear to try to track down a classloader leak on undeploy. Found a reference chain leading back to the TimedCachePolicy in JaasSecurityManager. Not sure if that's a problem -- should the cache be flushed on undeploy, or is it expected the ref will eventually clear when the entry times out? Pending finding an answer to the above, I decided to just have my test flush the "other" cache so I could see if there were other leakage paths. But it didn't work -- for some reason the entry was stored in the "HsqlDbRealm" cache. I have no idea why. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994890#3994890 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994890

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Need to create a branch for the 4.x based build

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

We need to create a branch to allow head to be configured to work with jboss5 and a branch for 4.x. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994889#3994889 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994889

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Going to pull the vfs packages into a separate project

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

With the latest vfs code, the server startup is 1m:43s while the code in the mc 2.0.0.Beta it starts in 13s. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994884#3994884 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994884

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Going to pull the vfs packages into a separate project

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The current mc/container/vfs trunk has been copied to a new maven project under: https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/vfs/trunk/ The tests run fine within eclipse, but when from from maven the vfsfile and vfsjar protocol handlers are not getting picked up for some reason. After testing against jboss-head I'll do a 2.0.4.snapshot release of this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994874#3994874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994874

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Web Console: Misc enhancements

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

I've added functionality to cancel and move tokens today. I've also added a process variable view and task list to the process instance screen. There may be one or two other features as well. I'm a bit hesitant on the cancel/move token functionality because it doesn't take into account the tasks that are currently pending. So you can move a token and just leave the task hanging out there. I've disabled the move button for now, but if you want to play with it, just remove the "true ||" part of the disabled="" string on the xhtml. Let me know what you think so far. Layout is still a mess, I know, but the content is getting in there finally, and that's really the important bit. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994868#3994868 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994868

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Why no 3.0.12 version src of gpd on anonyCVS??

by netbytesu

I've downloaded the jBPM-Designer-3.0.12.zip from sourceforge. But when i tried to download the src of 3.0.12 for org.jbpm.ui, it's strange that there's no 3.0.12 tag for this version?! The latest tag is jbpm_gpd_3_0_9_2. Why ? I also noticed that now the latest version downloadable on the sourceforge is 3.0.11. So where the 3.0.12 version gone?! It is so unusual. I want the latest stable version of binary and src. Where is it? Can someone tell me why? Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994857#3994857 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994857

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2006