August 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Collaboration Server] - Re: Status

by acoliver＠jboss.org

Management tool compatability has not been an aim. We intend to exceed the Exchange tools in this capacity. I'm open to the idea (that's a post 1.0 thing) but it is not an aim at present. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964647#3964647 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964647

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Collaboration Server] - Re: Help with Install on Windows XP

by acoliver＠jboss.org

If you use hpyersonic...do not "generate" just leave everything default. This is in the FAQ on the wiki. Generate hypersonic generates a DS for a REMOTE hypersonic. It cannot be called DefaultDS as that would interfere with the default local hypersonic. Sorry...it is confusing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964645#3964645 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964645

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Ordering of .ear subdeployments

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

"vickyk" wrote : | I can think of the possible way to get the JBAS-3503 rectified | 1) Modify the Test suite , removal of the -ds.xml from the jboss-app.xml and deploy this prior deploying the ejb . -1. The testcase ear is a perfectly valid deployment, and I doubt it's unusual in the real world. I know at my previous employer we had several ears like this. (I didn't write the testcase ear, so I'm not responsible for both examples ;) ) anonymous wrote : 2) Modify the EARDeployer to read the jboss-app.xml first and then the application.xml. This needs to be done in the init(..) of the EARDeployer . Personally I dont favor this and does not fit . I agree, doing that doesn't have a good "feel." That's because it doesn't address the fundamental problem -- JBAS-2904 assumes there is a clear ordering expressed in the ear deployment descriptors. But, there isn't, because there are two descriptors with mutually exclusive content. IMHO a correct solution to JBAS-2904 requires a clear way for the user to define the complete ordering. This isn't my call, but JBAS-2904 doesn't feel like something that should go out in a point release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964643#3964643 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964643

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Stress/Load Testing plan/suggestions

by danny_hon

It is nice to know that there is a plan for load test and volume test. However, the test cases you have may not reflect the true performance of the portal. The weather and news portlets depends on performance of web services provider and the network performance. It is better if you can use portlets (if there are any) than do not depend on external factors. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964629#3964629 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964629

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: snmp-adaptor get/set and a basic MIB

by bsturzoiu

sorry because prev times i submit withot xml configuration i use { instead < and } instead of > to proper display. start {mbean name="jboss.web:service=WebServer" handback="start"} {filter factory="NotificationFilterSupportFactory"} {enable type="jboss.tomcat.connectors.started"/} {/filter} {/mbean} stop {mbean name="jboss.system:type=Server" handback="stop"} {filter factory="NotificationFilterSupportFactory"} {enable type="org.jboss.system.server.stopped"/} {/filter} {/mbean} View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964620#3964620 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964620

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Heavy Refactoring of parameter syncing and ParameterMeta

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Ok, go ahead. jbossws/trunk is ALL GOOD against jbossas/trunk -r 55484 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964619#3964619 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964619

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: snmp-adaptor get/set and a basic MIB

by bsturzoiu

I using BarrierController to catch events like start web server and stop server. For start is OK, i am able to call a EJB method, but for stop, i cannot call an EJB because the undeploy process is allready begin I use for start: and for stop, i use: Any ideea to be able to call EJB methods when server will be stop (CTRL/C) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964616#3964616 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964616

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: snmp-adaptor get/set and a basic MIB

by bsturzoiu

I using BarrierController to catch events like start web server and stop server. For start is OK, i am able to call a EJB method, but for stop, i cannot call an EJB because the undeploy process is allready begin I use for start: and for stop, i use: Any ideea to be able to call EJB methods when server will be stop (CTRL/C) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964615#3964615 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964615

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: tree2 component retains its state after session invaldat

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

This doesn't has anything to do with jboss serialization. (If it does you're missing context anyways) I'm moving this to user's forum. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964607#3964607 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964607

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - tree2 component retains its state after session invaldation

by poojadgupta

I am using tree2 component as navigator in my application. The code is as follows: <t:tree2 id="navMenu" value="#{NavigationTreeHandler.expandedTreeData}" binding="#{NavigationTreeHandler.tree}" var="node" varNodeToggler="t" showLines="false" showNav="false" showRootNode="false" preserveToggle="false" clientSideToggle="false"> The tree works absolutely fine , but it persists its state even after the session has ended. When a new user logs in , instead of initially showing all the nodes collapsed the tree appears in the same state as the previous user had left it. How can I solve this. Need your help urgently View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964602#3964602 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964602

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2006