January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: direct navigation when starting a new process instance

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

It can be slightly more complicated than this. Starting a process instance may result in the creation of multiple tasks assigned to the person starting the task, or it may result in one or more group tasks being created, or some combination therein. If we want to shortcut the single-task case, that's fine, but if there are multiple tasks that are relevant to that user, we should go to an intermediate screen to allow the user to choose the task. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999035#3999035 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999035

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: simplified process instance view

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : I would like to have one central screen that combines all the process instance information : | * general process instance properties (aka summary) | * open tasks | * variables | * comments | * tokens Sounds good to me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999030#3999030 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999030

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: remove context sensitive menus

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : ProcessDefinition --> Process | ProcessInstance and Token --> Execution | | Maybe that could already be adopted into the web console for 3.2. But probably that would cause more confusion then it solves, no ? I like the new terminology a lot better, but I think that changing to "Execution" now would just be confusing. Changing "Process Definition" to "Process" is perfectly reasonable though, in my opinion. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999027#3999027 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999027

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Support JAXWS on EJB2.1

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

I don't think anyone is using it, or at least I have never seen a question relating to it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999022#3999022 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999022

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: new simplified menu structure

by kukeltje

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : | "bazoo" wrote : I get the following exception when I click "End task" or "More info needed", although the transition does happen: javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: /main/task/new_tasks.xhtml @41,57 value="#{entry.taskInstance.id}": Property 'taskInstance' is not found on type: java.lang.String | | | | David, are you onto this one ? Can you reproduce ? | I could reproduce this, but David already fixed it in cvs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999015#3999015 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999015

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: one central search page

by kukeltje

But I wold certainly not ditch the filtering at the top of the lists. Maybe they should be invisible at first and have an magnifying glass to open it. An 'advanced' button could take you to the generic search page with things on it like 'search processinstances with a variable y and value x' View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999009#3999009 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999009

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: replace sources tabs with links

by kukeltje

anonymous wrote : | A link will minimize the difference between the evaluation version and the 'real' version. | anonymous wrote : | | | | Why? It will either be 'links not visible in production' or 'tabs not visible in production' | | | | but I go with the majority ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999007#3999007 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999007

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: When should the webconsole mark tasks as started?

by kukeltje

This can be used to create reports with info on how long a task is in a 'queue' before acted upon. Very useful info for managers. oh and I like the 'bold' to, but maybe there should also be a column for this. Now I should (according to the feedback wiki page) make a jira issue and move it down on the list right... ok.. i'll do that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999005#3999005 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999005

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: When should the webconsole mark tasks as started?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i like the idea. good suggestion. the start field can be used for this... if a task instance is opened in the task form view and the task start is null, then put the current date in there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3998998#3998998 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3998998

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Console performance

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

The current form of the web console is definitely not intended as an example to get started with. This will grow out to become a fully fledged console, too complex for people to start using it as a JSF example. Of course, we should keep it as easy as possible for developers to tweak it, but including more functionality has priority. Indeed performance and stress tests are going to be needed. I would leverage the community to do the initial pinpointing of problems and only spend our own resournces on it after a potential SEAM refactoring. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3998997#3998997 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3998997

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007