October 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] Configuration of Experiment

by kukeltje

Don't get me wrong, I am hugely in favour of embedding the GPD and Form info (not the forms themselves, althoughhh....) in the processdefinition. But I want them t o have their own namespace. But you probably also remember that.... btw... Tom is in favour, Koen is, only one person that is (was?) against this is Gavin (yes that one). But now for Seam they also thinking of embedding some seam related meta info about a page in the xhtml of the page and not in the pages.xml so.... who knows. About the DSL ;-) Google is your friend One of the blogs points to: http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/DomainSpecificLanguage.html e.g. Drools/JBossRules has some things in this area where you can even create a DSL (although still rules related) Some other links: http://jspwiki.org/wiki/HowToImplementADomainSpecificLanguage http://www.infoq.com/news/domain-specific-language-debates (love this site!! one of my favourites, some nice discussions on WS-HELL) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092151#4092151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092151

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: JBAS-4766 Discussion thread

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Cause is http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-1194 . View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092142#4092142 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092142

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786

by bdecoste

I'm wondering what the trigger should be for us to support a 2.1 view (EJBObject)? Maybe just the existence of a Home interface? Is that better than explicit extends EJBObject? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092126#4092126 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092126

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Getting runtime component name from attachment

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : To summarize what we talked about this morning(here), MO is the server side view. We should just add a component name to the ManagedObject interface, along with a ManagementRuntimeRef annotation that can be used to identify which property defines the component name: | | | | public interface ManagedObject extends Serializable | | { | | /** | | * Get the runtime component name | | * @see {@linkplain ManagementRuntimeRef} | | * @return name of runtime component if one exists, null if no component exists. | | */ | | String getComponentName(); | | ... | | | I'll hack this part tomorrow in the morning. "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Beyond that its just a question of how the property value is translated into the getComponentName() value. By default it could just be the property value. It could be another plugin api to obtain the name for a given attachment type/property name at the deployer or AbstractManagedObjectFactory level to go beyond this. | I think some kind of translator could be added to AbstractManagedObjectFactory - e.g. translate ObjectName to ObjectName.getCanonicalName. Or it can already be a part of @ManagementRuntimeRef. "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Clients do not deal with ManagedObjects. They deal with ManagedDeployment/ManagedComponents. A ManagedComponent is an extension of ManagedObject currently, so if we want to be clean, either the common client side api could be factored into a common base interface, or ManagedComponent could just be a trimmed down client view of ManagedObject. | I think we can have a common interface which both MO and MC would extend, stripping some details from MC. I'll push in the initial common interface, and you can still refactor it later. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092123#4092123 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092123

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Maven Documentation

by wesleyhales

Covers setting up Maven, building modules/common and Idea setup. http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossPortalFromScratch View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092120#4092120 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092120

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Getting runtime component name from attachment

by alesj

"charles.crouch(a)jboss.com" wrote : So the ProfileServiceUnitTestcase would be using ManagedDeployment/ManagedComponents? It is already using just those. ;-) The question is should the MComp be stripped down - since now it extends MO. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092119#4092119 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092119

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Getting runtime component name from attachment

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

So the ProfileServiceUnitTestcase would be using ManagedDeployment/ManagedComponents? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092117#4092117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092117

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Getting runtime component name from attachment

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

To summarize what we talked about this morning(here), MO is the server side view. We should just add a component name to the ManagedObject interface, along with a ManagementRuntimeRef annotation that can be used to identify which property defines the component name: | public interface ManagedObject extends Serializable | { | /** | * Get the runtime component name | * @see {@linkplain ManagementRuntimeRef} | * @return name of runtime component if one exists, null if no component exists. | */ | String getComponentName(); | ... | Beyond that its just a question of how the property value is translated into the getComponentName() value. By default it could just be the property value. It could be another plugin api to obtain the name for a given attachment type/property name at the deployer or AbstractManagedObjectFactory level to go beyond this. Clients do not deal with ManagedObjects. They deal with ManagedDeployment/ManagedComponents. A ManagedComponent is an extension of ManagedObject currently, so if we want to be clean, either the common client side api could be factored into a common base interface, or ManagedComponent could just be a trimmed down client view of ManagedObject. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092109#4092109 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092109

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] Configuration of Experiment

by camunda

Hi Ronald! I remember that discussion, yes ;-) But I still think it is a very easy way to get started, just add some simulation parameters here and there in the existing process-defintion and run it. I don't want to mess too much required additonal XML files here... Can you give some more conrete thoughts what you mean with DSL in this context? Thanks Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092102#4092102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092102

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: When is there an EJBObject?

by ALRubinger

In reference to EJBTHREE-1058: Assuming: @Remote | public interface MyBusiness extends EJBObject ...what is the difference between the Proxy obtained via a lookup to this remote interface and the one obtained via a home.create() call? They are currently handled differently; one implementation specific is that when invoking "remove" from the Proxy obtained via lookup directly to remote interface, "dynamicInvoke" of the Container (StatefulContainer, for instance) the method hash of the invocation is not found in the method interceptors, and a RuntimeException is thrown before the proper call to invokeEJBObjectMethod(). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092101#4092101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092101

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2007