October 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBossXB-2.0.0.CR5

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

See the current org.jboss.test.ejb.metadata.test.EjbJar3xUnitTestCase.testServiceRefs in the jbossxb project. A simple ejb-jar.xml with a session/service-ref is failing with: anonymous wrote : | Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: {http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee}service-ref not found as a child of {http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee}session | at org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SundayContentHandler.startElement(SundayContentHandler.java:370) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.parser.sax.SaxJBossXBParser$DelegatingContentHandler.startElement(SaxJBossXBParser.java:402) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.xinclude.XIncludeHandler.startElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.parser.sax.SaxJBossXBParser.parse(SaxJBossXBParser.java:180) | ... 23 more | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091969#4091969 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091969

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - PreFillPooling Test failing

by adrian＠jboss.org

I'm currently working on http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4520 which involves moving all the tests that depend upon the transaction manager to run in the appserver against the real TM. I've moved the PreFillPooling test, but it was failing before I moved it. I get the same failures after the move. | [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.416 sec | [junit] Test org.jboss.test.jca.test.PreFillPoolingUnitTestCase FAILED | It might be that I introduced an additional reason for the four failures due to this change? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091960#4091960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091960

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: When is there an EJBObject?

by wolfc

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1058 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091956#4091956 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091956

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - When is there an EJBObject?

by wolfc

With the implementation of EJBTHREE-768 we've a clash on the usage of EJBObject. We had functionality that allowed each proxy to be an EJBObject. So now this test is failing: org.jboss.ejb3.test.stateful.unit.RemoteUnitTestCase.testEJBObject For terminology purposes I quote the spec: "EJB 3 3.1" wrote : Terminology note: This speci?cation uses the term remote business interface to refer to the business interface of an EJB 3.0 session bean that supports remote access. The term remote interface is used to refer to the remote component interface of the EJB 2.1 client view. The term local business interface refers to the local business interface of an EJB 3.0 session bean that supports local access. The term local interface is used to refer to the local component interface of the EJB 2.1 client view. It is important to note that 'remote interface != remote business interface'. I say what we had is a spec violation (you know me :-)). "EJB 3 4.3.3" wrote : The getEJBObject method returns the session bean?s remote interface. Only session beans with a remote EJBObject interface can call this method. "EJB 3 4.6.6" wrote : The [session bean's business] interface must not extend the javax.ejb.EJBObject or javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject interface. "EJB 3 4.6.7" wrote : The [session bean's remote] interface must extend the javax.ejb.EJBObject interface. Which leads to the question: for what scenario did we have this functionality? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091948#4091948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091948

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ManagedProperty serialization issue

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : I guess this should be added (or is this even part of what I was changing with implementing serialization to ClassInfo?), although it looks like an ugly implementation is about to come out of this. :-) | I added this to ReflectMethodInfoImpl (+ similar code to other ReflectX classes): | private void readObject(ObjectInputStream oistream) | throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException, NoSuchMethodException | { | oistream.defaultReadObject(); | int length = parameterTypes != null ? parameterTypes.length : 0; | Class<?>[] classes = new Class<?>[length]; | for(int j = 0; j < length; j++) | classes[j] = parameterTypes[j].getType(); | method = ReflectionUtils.findExactMethod(getDeclaringClass().getType(), name, classes); | } | Utils code: | | public static Method findMethod(Class clazz, String name, Class<?>... parameterTypes) | { | if (clazz == null) | return null; | | try | { | return clazz.getDeclaredMethod(name, parameterTypes); | } | catch(Exception ignored) | { | } | return findMethod(clazz.getSuperclass(), name, parameterTypes); | } | | public static Method findExactMethod(Class clazz, String name, Class<?>... parameterTypes) | throws NoSuchMethodException | { | Method method = findMethod(clazz, name, parameterTypes); | if (method == null) | throw new NoSuchMethodException(clazz + "." + name + " - " + Arrays.asList(parameterTypes)); | return method; | } | Which makes ReflectX classes know their Member instance after deserialization. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091946#4091946 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091946

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - AS integration project release procedure

by jhalliday

Hi All I've made a change in https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/integration/trunk and now I need to figure out how to do a release for use by the AS. The project has a top level pom and three children. Each of the four files has a version number in it. I've only updated one of the subprojects. Do I increment the versions for the others too or only for the parent and the one I've modified? And since the svn tag encompasses all of them, presumably it's name is based on the highest version across all the sub-projects? Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091936#4091936 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091936

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: Integration of different tx manager with AS (and EAP) bu

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"jhalliday" wrote : I'm not suggesting we ship the JTS with AS, although we could consider it. | It was considered back in November 2005, when we decided it (and WS-TX support) should be a separate download and not part of the AS distro. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091931#4091931 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091931

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: So what does unification mean for the ejb containers

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Also currently jboss_5_0.xsd has http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee as the target namespace which I think should be changed to a JBoss one. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091930#4091930 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091930

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBossXB-2.0.0.CR5

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Is there anything else that should be done to resolve Update to JBossXB 2.0.0.CR5 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4744 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091921#4091921 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091921

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Proxy Based POJOs (No AOP) in POJO Cache

by bela＠jboss.com

"manik.surtani(a)jboss.com" wrote : | I think having options is always valuable. The JavaBean standard is not a huge deal - I think people should follow this anyway. Why ? I never liked the JavaBeans approach, where even internal methods need to call accessors, like public int increment() { int retval=getAge(); setAge(retval +1); return retval } instead of public int increment() { return age++; } View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091920#4091920 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091920

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2007