November 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Bean declarations only in jboss.xml

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

A couple clustered EJB3 tests are failing because the bean jar includes an ejb-jar.xml but one bean in the test isn't listed there -- it's declared via annotation and has some overrides in jboss.xml, but no ejb-jar.xml entry. Seems this is failing because JBossEnterpriseBeansMetaData.merge() is ignoring the possibility that a bean could be listed only in jboss.xml and not in ejb-jar.xml. So, the jboss.xml-only bean isn't getting added to the merged set of beans. This is easy to fix; I've got a fix and a test. But before committing it I wanted to double check there's no problem with doing this in the EJB21 case -- the fix doesn't discriminate based on whether its EJB3 or EJB21. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106583#4106583 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106583

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Layout System (Repost)

by julien＠jboss.com

We are studying a bit layout systems in order to know what exists. - http://tiles.apache.org/tutorial/pattern.html - http://www.opensymphony.com/sitemesh/ - http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/compref/ So far I categorize (naively) in 2 categories: - components based approach where some components are UI organizational components. - templating systems where at runtime some mechanism produce the layout by pulling some state (coordinates) from the various laid out components. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106574#4106574 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106574

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Layout System

by julien＠jboss.com

One use case to not forget is that the window state of windows which are portlets can change and the layout must adapt to it using some mechanism (maximization). I don't want to have a hack like we have today with the "maximized" page. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106576#4106576 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106576

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Layout System

by julien＠jboss.com

We are studying a bit layout systems in order to know what exists. - http://tiles.apache.org/tutorial/pattern.html - http://www.opensymphony.com/sitemesh/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106574#4106574 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106574

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Annotation to metadata status

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"wolfc" wrote : I've added MultiviewBean as a nice test case and cleaned up MyStateless21Bean. | | What shall we do with MyStatefulBean? It has grown into a little monster. Do we want an EJB 3 view or an EJB 2.1 view. What is the issue with MyStatefulBean? Its still only using a fraction of the annotations it could. MyStatelessBean is the one with the larger usage. We do need to start segmenting the tests as currently the scan for classes make the check for the number of ejbs in the metadata useless. In general the deployers need to provide the classes so the classes that apply for a given test should just be specified. Could even be an annotation on the testcase method. What is the question about a 3/2.1 view? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106542#4106542 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106542

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Getting content of XML element

by adrian＠jboss.org

"kabir.khan(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Also, for a similar schenario I will need to construct a org.w3c.dom.Element from the nested contents of a element. Is that possible? | It works with the annotation based parsing. | public class ElementWildcard | { | private Element wildcard; | | public Element getWildcard() | { | return wildcard; | } | | @XmlAnyElement(lax=true) | public void setWildcard(Element wildcard) | { | this.wildcard = wildcard; | } | } | I couldn't get it to work properly with the old parser. Why do you want to do this? This is usually horrible. Is this the old XmlLoadable stuff? You should remove this, and configure them using the MC as normal beans. Then if somebody really wants to do this horrible thing you just do | <property name='bad" type="org.w3c.dom.Element"><![CDATA[<xml-here/>]]></property> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106527#4106527 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106527

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Getting content of XML element

by adrian＠jboss.org

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Presentation Framework update

by julien＠jboss.com

So now it downloads and compiles although the presentation and core-presentation needs to be compiled manually. I have not tested it works yet. "julien(a)jboss.com" wrote : I have started it there : http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/portal/branches/presentation/ | | It compiles the portal core using "build -Dgroups=core", the two modules presentation and core-presentation don't compile yet. | | Later, core-presentation will be integrated into 2.6.x and presentation will be modularized it (when I'll need it in portlet container module) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106524#4106524 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106524

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Proper definition of embedded jboss

by julien＠jboss.com

I see what you mean the sentence "This is going to become more and more important as we get to the deployment model we want to get to. That is, a model where you just throw a bunch of shit in your WEB-INF/lib or classpath and everything just works. " confused me. I assumed it would work cross deployments. "bill.burke(a)jboss.com" wrote : "julien(a)jboss.com" wrote : Bill, | | | | if you want to be useful (for the JBoss Portal project), you should provide us something similar to dysoweb http://dysoweb.requea.com/ based on JBoss MC. | | | | | | IMO, this is not the scope of Embedded. Embedded is supposed to work in the environment that instantiates it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106523#4106523 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106523

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Proper definition of embedded jboss

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

"julien(a)jboss.com" wrote : Bill, | | if you want to be useful (for the JBoss Portal project), you should provide us something similar to dysoweb http://dysoweb.requea.com/ based on JBoss MC. | | IMO, this is not the scope of Embedded. Embedded is supposed to work in the environment that instantiates it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106520#4106520 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106520

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2007