December 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

by eliBoss

I'm a new in this forum and i'm looking for an information on jms bindings file. I have a custom application that need to have a .bindings to configure the connection to a JMS resource (Topic, queue). I got the way to do it on a sonic adapter, but now i want to change the JMS manager to JBOSS one. The question is: is there some one who know the way to got the bindings file from jboss? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112306#4112306 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112306

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: JBoss Profiler 2

by jesper.pedersen

Since you posted in this thread I'll assume that you are using 2.0.CR7. JBoss-4.2.2.GA and JDK-1.5.0_13 is supported by the 2.0.CR7 release. It seems that something went wrong either in the download or the unpacking of the ZIP file. Try to download it again and post full details if the problem still is there - e.g. your JAVA_OPTS setting. Make sure that "jar tf jboss-profiler.jar" doesn't show any errors - and follow the instructions in the README.txt file regarding installation inside JBossAS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112300#4112300 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112300

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: RepositoryClassLoader::repository Null

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Yes... we have Executors.. I will have to clean up Executors ContextClassLoaders in our side View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112297#4112297 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112297

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: JBoss Profiler 2

by jorgemoralespou_2

Hi, I am trying this JBoss Profiler with a clean JBoss4.2.2 installation on a linux box and I get this error: | Error opening zip file: jboss-profiler.jar | Error occurred during initialization of VM | agent library failed to init: instrument | Â¡Help appreciated! My linux box is running: java version "1.5.0_13" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_13-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_13-b05, mixed mode) And it is a: Linux santander 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 23:05:12 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112278#4112278 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112278

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: setting managed property of type List

by alesj

OK, I'll use the proxy approach if the TypeInfo passed in for Composite is interface, otherwise I'll use the info to reconstruct the instance. But this means some details could get lost: | public class Pojo | ... | public class SubPojo extends Pojo | ... | MetaValue mv = MVF.create(new SubPojo(), Pojo.class); | SubPojo sp = MVF.unwrap(mv); // failed!! | I guess I could expand proxy usage to what I did with lazy stuff, to be able to handle classes as well for proxying: - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/trunk/kern... But for Collections, you're saying there is nothing better than a default impl? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112269#4112269 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112269

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: setting managed property of type List

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | If we only remember its interface and then have a map 'interface --> default impl', then we forget about polymorphism. | e.g. I would still like to have MyInterface1 and MyInterface2, both implementing Interface, taken apart, but when I want to re-construct them, I very much care about the impl details. Aha, I see. The proxy approach would work here. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112250#4112250 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112250

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: setting managed property of type List

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I don't get the reference to OO? | OK, this is a mechanism for taking apart non serializable objects. If we only remember its interface and then have a map 'interface --> default impl', then we forget about polymorphism. e.g. I would still like to have MyInterface1 and MyInterface2, both implementing Interface, taken apart, but when I want to re-construct them, I very much care about the impl details. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112248#4112248 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112248

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: setting managed property of type List

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | 1) Create a proxy | http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/trunk/mbeans/src/main/... | | The proxy approach doesn't work for collections since they aren't javabeans. It's also immutable. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112242#4112242 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112242

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: setting managed property of type List

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | Generically, we could allow some kind of plugin mechanism to allow | | somebody to configure: | | interface -> implementation class or factory | Even for non collection classes? | The composite ones. | Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of OO? :-) I don't get the reference to OO? This is reflection/serialization where we've taken apart the object to split its state into "primitives". The issue is how do we reconstruct it. e.g. | @ManagementProperty | public void setSomething(Interface i) {} | | public interface Interface | { | void setInteger(int i); | void setString(String s); | } | This is a composite with two primitive properties, but we don't know what the implementation is. There are two options 1) Create a proxy http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/trunk/mbeans/src/main/... 2) Allow somebody to define what the implementation class is (or a factory to create one) The proxy approach doesn't work for collections since they aren't javabeans. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112241#4112241 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112241

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: setting managed property of type List

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Generically, we could allow some kind of plugin mechanism to allow | somebody to configure: | interface -> implementation class or factory Even for non collection classes? The composite ones. Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of OO? :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112236#4112236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112236

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2007