December 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Major regression in EJBSpecUnitTestCase run time

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

With my effort to move the configuration/setup of the security managers out of JaasSecurityManagerService, the security managers created may not be set up with a cachepolicy. I need to check this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111108#4111108 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111108

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Asynchronous Continuation with JBPM 3.2.2

by mandrita.ca

Hi tom, I checked out the web.xml file of the deployed web-app and found the following entry: <servlet-name>JobExecutorServlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.jbpm.job.executor.JobExecutorServlet</servlet-class> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>JobExecutorServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/jobs</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> So the job executor loads up on startup.But is there some other way I can verify the same? One more thing I am trying the fork-join concept.As the fork node states that it splits an execution path into branches.However when i associate two tasks with the fork handler and attach two action handler for the same to print the Thread IDs i find that the Thread IDs are same and also i verified that these classes are executed on the same thread as when one branch throws an error the entire execution stops.Also as you mentioned that pending messages get inserted into the JBPM_JOB table i didn't find any entry for the two asynch nodes. Where am i going wrong?Totally clueless... Please help. Thanks, Mandrita View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111102#4111102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111102

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Profiler Setup

by william-zhu

additional informations: the followings are my enverionment: - Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] - sun jvm 1.4.2_12. - I do not recompile the dll file. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111101#4111101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111101

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Profiler Setup

by william-zhu

Hello, thanks for your help! now, I got the issue about directory. but encoutered a new problem when attemptting to add a parameter to JVM by executing the following: java -XrunjbossInspector:/tmp,include=org.jboss,ignore=*,start=org.jboss.mq.MQServer the messages are like: this is the new DLL Running process on Windows 4040 Usage: java [-options] class [args...] <to execute a class> or java [-options] -jar jarfile [args....] <to execute a jar file> ....................... I have read the guides and a jboss profiler quick start released in the forum. Installation quick start: 1) copy jboss-profiler-noAOP.sar to the JBoss AS deploy directory 2) put jbossInspector.dll in your PATH (Windows) or libjbossInspector.so in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH (Linux/Unix) 3) copy jboss-profiler.war to the JBoss AS deploy directory Configuration: 1) Add something like this to the JBoss JVM options: -XrunjbossInspector:/tmp/profiler,include=com.unisys,ignore=*,memory=false Make sure the output directory (/tmp/profiler in this example) exists. thanks for your any ideas View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111097#4111097 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111097

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Disabling security on destinations

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Well... this is how it behaves now... I will need Tim to comment on that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111094#4111094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111094

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: JBoss Profiler Quick Start

by william-zhu

I encoutered an issue at the step 2). This is the new DLL Running process on Windows 2100 Usage: java [-options] class [args...] <to execute a class> or java [-options] -jar jarfile [args...] View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111093#4111093 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111093

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Disabling security on destinations

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, if there is no security config on the destination, there would be no security check. The org.jboss.test.security.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCase.testRunAsWithRoles. The mdb's run-as identity is being seen by the jms destination, but there should be no security check. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111089#4111089 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111089

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Disabling security on destinations

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Scott, I didn't understand your issue... Did you mean "with the jbossmq this destination would have *no* security check? How it was supposed to behave? JBM is just getting the default security from ServerPeer if no destination is provided on QueueService. What testcase is this... and I will be taking a look as I'm messing with upgrading JBM and looking at testcases on 5 now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111082#4111082 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111082

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Exception propagation using HTTP servlet transport on 1.

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Actually, that should have been, change | servlet://${jboss.bind.address}:8080/servlet-invoker/ServerInvokerServlet | to | servlet://${jboss.bind.address}:8080/servlet-invoker/ServerInvokerServlet/?return-exception=true | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111081#4111081 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111081

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Exception propagation using HTTP servlet transport on 1.

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Hi Martin, In $SERVER_HOME/server/default/$DEPLOY_DIR/ejb3.deployer/META-INF/jboss-service.xml, change the line | <attribute name="InvokerLocator">socket://${jboss.bind.address}:3873</attribute> | to | <attribute name="InvokerLocator">socket://${jboss.bind.address}:3873/?return-exception=true</attribute> | As you say, you can't access this stuff programmatically. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111079#4111079 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111079

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2007