so let me understand this correctly.
you have a university portal and you are creating a JSR168 portlet and integrating this into the university portal?
If thats the case, when a user signs on to the university portal using the so called blue-stem method you described,
the portlet running inside this university portal will be running in the authenticated state.
Again, based on your explanation, i am assuming the portlet is running inside the university portal where the user is logging in. Is this assumption correct?
Thanks
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020325#4020325
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020325
Hi,
I need to know how to develop a function to do user Authentication between a portlet and Portal frame. I am developing a portlet by JSR 168 under Portal frame for a University. We need just a single sign-on to the portal.
The university has a so-called blue-stem sign on for every student and staff. Now I am developing a portlet plugged into the Portal. I use JSP/Java to develop portlet. When an user signs onto the blue-stem system, it can automatically get him/her into the portlet.
For example, user id = abcd, password = xxxx. the Portal can catch this login from blue-stem system and pass back into User Authentication between portlet and Portal
I want to know how to develop this function. If I need to insert a code, where should I input? Any simple code will be very help me start. Thanks a lot.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020314#4020314
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020314
1) For Rex: My previous suggestion might not hold water. I am now playing around with a property<property name="includeMessageInContext" value="true" />
so the setVariableValues will include the originating message in the command Message if that value is true
2) For Ronald:
What about for example:
<action class=".....">
| <property name="mapping">
| <direction from="jbpm">
| <variable jbpmName="x1" messageProp="z3" />
| <variable jbpmName="x2" messageProp="z2" />
| <variable jbpmName="x3" messageProp="z1" />
| </property>
| </action>
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020144#4020144
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020144
I think we need some notion of scoped names that allows this to be done easily. This seems to be needed in order to resolve item 2) as well. A proper alias would then be a simple name in a scope that links to the scoped name to which the alias resolves.
Regarding 1), I'm not clear on what the relationship is between the kernels, names spaces, and type systems are. I'm assuming that whether or not the type systems are isolated/shared is strictly a function of the bean configuration in the kernels. Based on the initialization algorithm Adrian described, it should be possible to pickup the beans in a given state across the graph of kernel instances. Are you traversing all contexts across all kernels for a given state?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020138#4020138
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020138
One thing that would be nice is to also have a kind of mapping from elements in the message to individual processvariables. e.g. a (collection of) xpath statement(s) or maybe an xslt that take a message and produce an (set of) individual value(s). Don't know if that should be a transformer or functionality of the jbpm 'connector'. This is ofcourse only interesting if the process is modeled in jbpl (which does not support xml messages, at least not as real xml 'type') bpel does support it.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020133#4020133
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020133