February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: jBPM in JBossESB

by estebanschifman

A better name would probably be: messageToJbpmContext(Message) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020125#4020125 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020125

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: jBPM in JBossESB

by estebanschifman

Good idea Rex. If we put your code inside the CommandInterpreter with another method name (e.g. copyVariables), and we use : <action process="copyVariables,process" /> then the message will be copied to the context before invoking the process method, without the need of another action class View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020123#4020123 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020123

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: WARN message if tx is not ACTIVE or PREPARING

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

1.4.1.SP3 is in JIRA View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020094#4020094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020094

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: WARN message if tx is not ACTIVE or PREPARING

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-982 This is done in HEAD and Branch_JBossCache_1_4_0. Do you want to create a new post-1.4.1.SP2 Fix Version for bugs we fix in 1.4.x? When that's there I'll close the JIRA. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020090#4020090 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020090

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: WARN message if tx is not ACTIVE or PREPARING

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Yeah, I'd go with #2 as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020062#4020062 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020062

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: jBPM in JBossESB

by rex.sheridan

Esteban, I think we may have a slight miscommunication. My idea is to put the ESB message into the jBPM ContextInstance, not to get the jBPM context into the message (although that is useful too). >From what I can see in the code it is possible to get the message into the context. However, I think it currently requires some mechanism outside the CommandInterpreter (i.e. another action in the pipeline) to set it up. Here is what I think that action code may look like. | public Message process(Message message) { | | CommandVehicle command = new CommandVehicle(CommandVehicle.Operation.setProcessInstanceVariables); | | Map<String, Object> variables = new HashMap<String, Object>(); | variables.put("message", message); | command.setVariableValues(variables); | | return command.toCommandMessage(); | | } | What I am really looking for is some way to configure the CommandInterpreter to do this for me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020014#4020014 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020014

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Configuring Destinations

by apk2072

In my application I am adding several destinations (Queues), one way of binding those destinations is create a myApp-service.xml and drop in the $JBOSS/server/default/deploy folder. Instead of above approach, is there any other way I can bind the destinations? All my destination configuration is maintained in one of our database tables, I am looking something that during the server startup this configuration information is retrieved from the database table and do the binding instead of reading from the ../deploy/myApp-service.xml. Thanks in advance, APK. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019995#4019995 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4019995

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: jboss/remoting 2.2.0.Alpha7 not compatible with jboss5

by timfox

Ok, I can see it is 5.15 by looking at the commented out section in component-info.xml. What is the long term solution for this? I don't think us manually enforcing dependencies by looking at commented out sections in other projects' component-info.xml is a good way to go... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019951#4019951 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4019951

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: jboss/remoting 2.2.0.Alpha7 not compatible with jboss5

by timfox

Our jboss messaging test run now fails to run, since the build no long pulls in apache-tomcat because (needed for our tests that involve the remoting http transport) it is not listed in the remoting dependencies. I have added an explicit dependency to apache-tomcat in our project, but I have no idea what version to use now, since it is not listed as an explicit remoting depency. How can I find out which version I should use? (I have guessed 5.5.20 for now) Surely I should only be using the version that remoting is tested against which should be that listed in the remoting dependencies (and is not anymore) ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019947#4019947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4019947

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: cannot deploy processdefinition from GPD via jbpm-enterp

by jeffdelong

Opps, got left out somehow. What I meant was that: | <field name="isCurrentSessionEnabled"><true /></field> | needed to be set to false. With CMTransactionFactory, Hibernate expects a transaction to already be started. When uploading via the console, this does not appear to be the case. So JTATransactionFactory is required, which means Hibernate will start the transaction if one does not already exist. isCurrentSessionEnabled (getCurrentSession() )does not appear to get a current session if a transaction is not already in progress, even with JTATransactionFactory set. This may be a defect in Hibernate? My recommendation in this situation is to inject the session into the jbpmContext via jbpmContext.setSession(session). Granted this is more work for the developer, so getting getCurrentSession to work would be preferable. This is simple to test. Just deploy jbpm-enterprise.ear to JBoss (I tested with 4.0.5), start it, and attempt to deploy a processdefinition from the GPD. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019914#4019914 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4019914

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007