February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta2

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

There already is a 2.0 branch under https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/branches/2_0/. This will need to be updated with selected pieces, or replaced since the current snapshot is off of trunk. If you can hold off on committing any disruptive changes until this is complete that would be good. I'm only looking for needed bug fixes for the current snapshot at this point. PM means ~ 1700 PST = 0100 GMT Saturday morning. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018323#4018323 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018323

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Usage of StatefulBeanContext TxSynchronized property

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

i'll have to trace why I had that in there... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018309#4018309 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018309

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Funky config needed for extended PersistenceContext repl

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

Seems like a HEM problem, i'll ping emmanuel. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018307#4018307 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018307

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta2

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Any issues added to this need to be done by Friday PM PST so I can do the release. What's the exact time? PM meaning in the afternoon? I've just started with scoping controller. Should I wait with commiting code till Friday? Or will you create a separate branch? - https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/branches/ There is already a new ControllerState PRE_INSTALL in the trunk, but this is a simple additional state with some of the code moving from DESCRIBE state. And all previous tests pass - ok, I had to fix some of them, but it was an expected failure due to non-dependency state addition. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018301#4018301 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018301

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messaging 1.2.0 integration with JBoss 5.0.Beta

by ovidiu.feodorov＠jboss.com

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : Are you thinking of doing this just to avoid needing jgroups.jar in server/default/lib? If so, I'd say we should just include the jar there. There's a JIRA for shared web sessions that I'll do for 5.0 that in default would use JBoss Cache in LOCAL (non-replicated) mode. Even in local mode JBC requires jgroups on the classpath, so jgroups.jar is very likely to end up in server/default/lib anyway. OK. Regardless, JBM non-clustered should not depend on JGroups. It's good that we have a choice, though. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018269#4018269 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018269

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - JBAS-4109, jbossws-2.0.0.CR4?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

We need a non-snapshot release of jbossws that includes an updated remoting dependency that is consistent with the jbm 2.2.0.Alpha7. Currently there is some snapshot that indicates its jbossws-2.0.0.CR3: 09:07:05,109 INFO [ServiceEndpointManager] jbossws-2.0.0.CR3 (build=200702151515) What will it take to get a jbossws-2.0.0.CR4 release for this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018233#4018233 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018233

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - JBossXB-1.0.0.CR10

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

There are a number of issues in the JBossXB-1.0.0.GA that are unlikely to be done in the near term. I have created a JBossXB-1.0.0.CR10 to include in the AS5 Beta2 release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018227#4018227 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018227

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - JBAS-2100 AOP integration in JBoss5

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

We need a release beyond the current aop snapshot incorporated into head. I'm using the current JBAS-2100 to track that. Is this doable over the next week? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018210#4018210 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018210

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta2

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I created a JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta2 due out next Friday for inclusion into the AS5 Beta2. Any issues added to this need to be done by Friday PM PST so I can do the release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018186#4018186 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018186

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: various questions

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : Alex, I think you're missing the point here - this is not a mandatory field. This is a field that can be used by simple applications (which I believe will be the majority). Applications for which this field is not useful need not use it, and thus are unaffected. My concern is not the business key being mandatory (clearly it is not) but the lack of flexibility in its type and multiplicity. I can easily think of a process whose instances are identified by purchase order and customer name. Even for this simple case we already push the developer to implement a custom conversion framework. Since jBPM converters already exist just for that purpose, we could throw them in at no charge. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018180#4018180 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018180

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007