February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - JBAS-2584 -- LocalTransaction events for JMS

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Discussion of http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2854 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017613#4017613 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017613

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-3206 -- Quartz In

by weston.price＠jboss.com

For the simple task of the Quartz RAR being included in the realease (not the full task of Quartz/Timer work). I don't see anything wrong with including it in 4.2. I am not wild about the implementation for a few reasons (ie starting Quartz by default which can lead to multiple schedulers being active and present it should really wait until an endpoint is deployed that needs it), but what the hell...lock and load. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017610#4017610 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017610

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-3206 -- Quartz In

by adrian＠jboss.org

Just include it in docs/examples/jca and as an option on the installer then we are done aren't we? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017607#4017607 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017607

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-3206 -- Quartz In

by weston.price＠jboss.com

I need to confirm with the EJB3 team whether or not they actually require the RAR. I don't believe they do but I will double check. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017569#4017569 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017569

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-3206 -- Quartz In

by dimitris＠jboss.org

So do we want to include this with the configuration of jboss 4.2? There will be only one merged configuration with ejb3 included, so we either include or exlude quartz-ra.rar (before it was only part of the ejb3 setup). I didn't see any progress in the linked jira issue http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-3206 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017568#4017568 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017568

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - How to Configure IAIK's SSL in Jboss

by sreeharijboss

Hi I have to use iaik ssl in Jboss. How is that I configure Jboss such that it uses iaik's ssl implemetations. Thnx in advance Sreehari saisrehari(a)hotmail.com View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017566#4017566 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017566

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException in write / read intens

by inrusu

Hi there, Trying my luck with JBossCache 1.4.1.SP1 on a Websphere 6.1.0.3 cluster with 2 nodes each node with 1 server. The OS on both machines is Windows XP Professional SP2. I'm using the replSync-service.xml configuration file supplied in download ( etc\META-INF folder ). I've changed only the cache mode to INVALIDATION_SYNC because I need the sync happen sync and REPL_SYNC was too slow. I'm running some tests which do both cache read / write I'm getting lots of org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException when acquiring locks. The scenario in which the TimeOut occurs is the following : All the operations occur on a TreeCache with one node with one entry only in the node: in Node1 modify a node - the invalidation msg is snd in Node2 the WL is acquired by a user thread - the invalidation msg is rcv - the JGroups thread tries to put a WL and fails with a time out which is send to Node1 ..... and this keeps going on. What are the recomandations in this situations ( indeed this is an extrem situations with some many updates on the same entry ): 1. increase the timeout period ( the current one is zero ) 2. use optimistic locking ( how can I configure it ?) 3. other ? Thanks Ionut RUSU View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017565#4017565 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017565

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Full smoke test suite passing with future CR1

by ovidiu.feodorov＠jboss.com

All our smoke tests pass (scroll down, it seems there's a bug in rendering html tables) <h1>JBoss Messaging Smoke Test Results</h1> Java version: 1.4.2_12 Run on: Fri Feb 16 02:07:52 PST 2007<h2>Installation Test Results</h2> queuetopichttpsecure-socketmdbmdb-failurestatelessdistributed-queuedistributed-topicqueue-failover 4.0.1sp1 (scoped, not clustered)OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.1sp1 (scoped, CLUSTERED)OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.2 (scoped, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.2 (scoped, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3 (scoped, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3 (scoped, installer generated, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3 (scoped, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3 (scoped, installer generated, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3SP1 (scoped, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3SP1 (scoped, installer generated, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3SP1 (scoped, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.3SP1 (scoped, installer generated, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.4.GA (scoped, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.4.GA (scoped, installer generated, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.4.GA (standalone, not clustered) OK OK OK 4.0.4.GA (scoped, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.4.GA (scoped, installer generated, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.4.GA (standalone, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.5.GA (scoped, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.5.GA (scoped, installer generated, not clustered) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.5.GA (standalone, not clustered) OK OK OK 4.0.5.GA (scoped, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.5.GA (scoped, installer generated, CLUSTERED)OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 4.0.5.GA (standalone, CLUSTERED) OK OK OK OK OK OK View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017532#4017532 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017532

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - testcases overwritten

by akostadinov

See http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4103 for descripttion of the problem. Any ideas how to fix? Should we rename testcases run by all but tests-standard-unit target? Below is what I found about it for 4.0 branch (there could be some more not caught here): 1. cat tests.log | grep "\[junit\] Running" | sed -e 's/.\+ Running $.\+$/\1/' | sort | uniq -d > tests.log.dup 2. sed -e 's/.\+nowrap.\+href="$.\+$\.html".\+/\1/p' -e 'd' reports/allclasses-frame.html | sed -e 'y/\//./' > tests.log.report 3. cat tests.log.* | sort | uniq -d I get these (45 total): org.jboss.test.bmp.test.BmpUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.bmp.test.SmallCacheBmpUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.ageout.test.JDBC2PmAgeOutUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.audit.test.AuditUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.batchcascadedelete.test.BatchCascadeDeleteUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.cacheinvalidation.test.CacheInvalidationUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.cacheinvalidation.test.JDBC2PmCacheInvalidationUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.cmrstress.CMRStressTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.cmr.test.CMRPostCreatesWrittenUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.cmrtransaction.test.CMRTransactionUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.cmrtree.test.CascadeDeleteUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.commerce.CompleteUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.dbschema.relationship.RelationshipSchemaUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.distinct.DistinctUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.ejbselect.EJBSelectUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.ejbselect.JDBC2PmEJBSelectUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.enums.test.EnumUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.enums.test.JDBC2PmEnumUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.fkmapping.test.FKMappingUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.fkstackoverflow.test.FKStackOverflowUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.idxandusersql.test.IdxAndUsersqlUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.jbas1361.JBAS1361UnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.jbas1665.JBAS1665UnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.jbas3541.JBAS3541UnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.jbas3541.JDBC2PmJBAS3541UnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.jbas3717.JBAS3717UnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.jbas979.JBAS979UnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.keygen.test.KeyGenerationUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.lob.LOBUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.optimisticlock.test.OptimisticLockUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.partitionindex.PartitionIndexUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.passivation.test.EntityPassivationUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.perf.test.PerfUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.readonly.ReadonlyUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.relationship.RelationshipUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.simple.PageSizeUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.cmp2.simple.SimpleUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.jacc.test.external.AuthzDelegationUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.jmx.test.RMIAdaptorAuthorizationUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.security.test.auth.AppCallbackHandlerUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.testbean.test.BeanUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.testbyvalue.test.ByValueUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.webservice.jbws309.JBWS309TestCase org.jboss.test.web.test.FormAuthUnitTestCase org.jboss.test.web.test.UserInRoleUnitTestCase ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Below I what Jarek found about 4.0.5.GA_CP status: tests.log: number of test cases: grep "Running" tests.log|wc -l 730 number of tests: grep "Tests run" tests.log|awk '{print $4}'|awk -F, '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}' 4182 html log: number of test cases: 726 (4 test cases lost) number of tests: 4167 (15 tests lost) These tests are run twice, but I get only one report: org.jboss.test.jmx.test.RMIAdaptorAuthorizationUnitTestCase (2 tests) org.jboss.test.security.test.auth.AppCallbackHandlerUnitTestCase (3 tests) This test is run five times, but only three reports: org.jboss.test.webservice.jbws309.JBWS309TestCase (5 tests) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017514#4017514 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017514

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Inheriting from ProcessDefinition

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

If your current design is based on inheritence, adding the discriminator in the hibernate mappings is probably the simplest. You'll have to do this for the BPEL mappings only as a modification to the jPDL mappings. But in the current jPDL design, using the ModuleDefinition is the most 'natural'. This comes down to replacing inheritence (what you actually want) with inheritence. If you would take this route, this is what you gotta know: There is a configuration file that configures the default modules created when a process definition is created. You could add a BpelModule. But of course, the module definition approach was a bad design choice and it will be replaced by inheritence in jbpm 4. does that answer all your questions ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017497#4017497 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017497

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007