February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remote Tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Almost 1.5 years later :-)... I'm about to remove this formatter. As I'm importing JBossTestCase for the new MDB integration tests I'm writting, as I had my hands on it.. I'm also removing this. I will commit this with everything I'm working on now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017297#4017297 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017297

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Help needed: Is it possible to develop an application using

by sriharsha.chevuru

Is it possible to develop an application using JBOSS in devlopment phase and deploy it in Websphere? I want to know what are the issues that arises and what are the changes that needs to be made to code and configuration. I don't need the details but probably pointers in that directions would be enough. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017294#4017294 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017294

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Build System Meeting Agenda for Feb 15

by pgier

Meeting Notes ---------------- We agree that having a separate snapshot repository is a good idea. Until we get this repository, we will set up a temporary server maybe using one of the QA servers. For each project we should have the options of doing nightly snapshot builds and/or as needed developer builds. For the next meeting I will create a demo/guide of using the maven release and assembly plugins. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017281#4017281 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017281

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: various questions

by jeffdelong

IMO the best way to add a "business key" to a processInstance is by extending ProcessInstance (using the Hibernate subclass mechanism). Unfortunately, when I tried to do this in the past, I had issues with hibernate proxies, etc. The benefit of this approach (assuming the proxy issues could be resolved) is that the developer can extend ProcessInstance with whatever data type or however many business keys they deem appropriate, and then create hibernate queries as needed to support their requirement. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017280#4017280 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017280

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Build System Meeting Agenda for Feb 15

by pgier

Ok, I will look into duplicating that functionality in maven. No, the module shouldn't be considered fully migrated until all the steps are duplicated or replaced, and we actually remove the ant scripts. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017279#4017279 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017279

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: various questions

by brittm

anonymous wrote : After all, users might think of a process instance as a "ticket" or a "request" or an "order", rather than as a process instance. That's really my point. Those business concepts are established prior to defining the process defs that serve them. By allowing the developer to specify a business entity /context for the key via jpdl, then the business entity that the process/execution is intended to represent is clear (and quickly and easily queryable). In the scenario I'm proposing, a keyable business concept is represented by one or more processes (definitions) --duh. The defs specify the concept or entity type they represent, and their executions reference the business key. The 'type' and 'key' together provide the necessary business context. To put it differently--The question is whether the business context (keyed entity representation) should be derived from the process name, some user table, or up front by configuration. If context is derived from the process name, the developer has to implement plumbing to map potentially several process names back to a business concept--and he has to do it everywhere--UI resource bundles, every imaginable report, etc. However, if business context is provided in process config the developer only has to specify it once--now the domain relationship is established. If an 'order' is only ever represented by a single parent 'order' process, then none of this is a big deal. However, if an 'order' can result in the execution of a 'New Customer Order', or a 'Change Order', or a 'Move Service Order', or a 'Cancel Service Order' process being started, then it becomes an issue, because all of these separate processes are probably still 'just an order' as far as business keys go. If my thinking is off base here, or too narrow, somebody slap me back on track :) -Britt View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017273#4017273 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017273

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Build System Meeting Agenda for Feb 15

by ryan.campbell＠jboss.com

The plugin needs to implement retrocheck as well, but I'm talking about the "test" target in the existing build.xml which is run using a 1.4 jvm to validate that the 1.5 features used in the src/tests are correctly/completely transformed. Can the module be considered migrated unless the tests are executed under maven as well? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017246#4017246 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017246

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: Debug support for Serialization

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : Every class in my app is serializable and has a default constructor. This problem is about non serializable classes without a default constructor. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017203#4017203 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017203

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Labs] - Re: Links in Labs 2

by julien＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | jboss.org/<project-name>/forums/dev/12452/46 | that kind of links is very from a semantic point of view because the URI points to the resource : i.e the post 46 in the forum 12453 in the project <project-name> of the site jboss.org now it's going to be tough for you to do that because between the forum and the URL mapper of portal there is the Portlet API + JSF layers which don't have really the notion of resources. one programmatic way would be the customization of the PortalObjectCommandFactory to understand what portlet it is displaying and interpret the command data to properly format the URL. there are maybe better programmatic ways to achieve it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017197#4017197 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017197

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: Does JBossSerialization improves performance for Entrnai

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I don't think this write(bytes[]) would be any different... But you could give it a try with JBoss Serialization to see how it goes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017195#4017195 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017195

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007