February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-808 - Fail

by timfox

Ah right. This is a clustered setup where you have multiple partial queues. I was thinking you were retrying on the same partial queue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011578#4011578 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011578

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-808 - Fail

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

The query output is kind of hard to read here on the forum... but all that matters is.. you have one message... and two references.. (one for queueId=0 and anotheron to queuedId=10) 10 is the failedOver queue, and 0 is the original queue on the node. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011576#4011576 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011576

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-808 - Fail

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JMS specific columns in DB

by timfox

JMS_MESSAGE stores messages which logically live in either JMS queues or JMS durable topic subscriptions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011574#4011574 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011574

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-808 - Fail

by timfox

If you're not getting a PK violation, either the message is non persistent, or it's not the same message you're sening. Is the message id the same? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011573#4011573 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011573

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JMS specific columns in DB

by jeffdelong

Is this table required to support persistent queues? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011572#4011572 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011572

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-808 - Fail

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I found out why testFailureRightAfterSend was not failing. I was expecting the message to be delivered only on the failedOver consumer, but it is also being delivered to a pre-existent consumer on the new node. So.. I have changed the testcase and I can verify a duplication. It's not throwing a PrimaryKey exception as the server is creating an extra reference. (one for the failedOver queue, and one for the original queue on the new server). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011571#4011571 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011571

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - JMS specific columns in DB

by timfox

Currently there are a few JMS specific columns in the database, e.g. JMS_MESSAGE table: destination reply_to correlation_id jms_type As part of http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-739 I am considering removing those columns and just storing those values as core headers in the message. E.g. there would be a core header called JBM.JMS.Destination (or whatever), which had destination as its value. Having no JMS specific stuff in the db schema would have the advantage of enabling us to more cleanly support other message formats (e.g. AMQP) without changing the schema. It would also remove any JMS dependencies from JDBCPersistenceManager. Comments please? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011566#4011566 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011566

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of the JBoss EJB Container] - Re: Reducing Java object lock contention in org.jboss.invoca

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

No objections. It should be synced with trunk as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011447#4011447 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011447

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: ready for release ?

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

It should be all ready for beta release now, unless there are remaining problems that I am not aware of. Two weeks should be fine, I'll focus on testing for that time period. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011435#4011435 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011435

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007