"pgier" wrote : Should the tests for each module actually be a separate project (ie. separate folder and pom.xml), or is the way that maven creates a [project-name]-tests.jar ok?
|
The artifact is the main thing. e.g. the aop-mc-int tests rerun
the kernel tests over the aop integration.
Eventually, I would think we would want to pull all these test artifacts into
one big integration testsuite.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029833#4029833
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029833
"weston.price(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| The JAXB deployer helper shouldn't live in jboss-deployers.jar
| because otherwise the JAXB jar will need to be in the bootstrap classpath
| alongside jboss-deployers.jar
|
Fine by me. We can put it anywhere that allows me to get me work done. I don't care where it lives. Note, I actually put it alonside the jboss-deployers.jar as a test, with the same results.
If you want to get some work done until it is correctly refactored.
cp jaxb.jar JBOSS_HOME/lib
./run.sh -B jaxb.jar
or copy it/them to jre/lib/ext
anonymous wrote :
| I assume you knew it wasn't going to work when you checked it in,
|
That is what I said when in the original post (second paragraph):
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=99846
anonymous wrote :
| so I will similarly assume you have an idea of where to put to it to actually make it functional.
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029828#4029828
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029828
Should the tests for each module actually be a separate project (ie. separate folder and pom.xml), or is the way that maven creates a [project-name]-tests.jar ok?
SPI should be a separate project for each component of microcontainer, right? For container, do we want 4 separate sub-directories (one for each sub-project listed) and within these a separate SPI and impl directories? Or should it be a more flat directory structure?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029826#4029826
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029826