March 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Breaking up the MC project and Mavenizing it

by pgier

I added assemblies for aop-mc-int and dependency. Please take a look, and if it is ok I will do the same thing for the other subprojects. Once deployed, other projects can use these artifacts using a classifier. So a dependency on aop-mc-int-aspects would look like this: | <dependency> | <groupId>jboss</groupId> | <artifactId>jboss-aop-mc-int</artifactId> | <version>2.0</version> | <classifier>aspects</classifier> | </dependency> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029958#4029958 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029958

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test cleanup in jboss5

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I will talk to Richard Achmatowicz about this tomorrow... He has done the initial messaging tests... I will talk to him, and I guess the best thing to do would be what you said. Last time I talked to him, he was waiting on the 1.2.0.GA release to drop those tests, as some of them would be invalid as we were missing some required features that we have fixed now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029947#4029947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029947

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: org.jboss.test.cts.test.MDBUnitTestCase

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

There are incompatibilities between woven classes with AOP 2 and AOP 1.5.. If I cleared my client and rebuilt everything... it worked. So we would need or to fix the compatibility issue with AOP, or rebuilt messaging using the new weave format. (what would cause incompatibility for users using the actual release). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029944#4029944 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029944

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Breaking up the MC project and Mavenizing it

by pgier

"alesj" wrote : I think the way things are now - with directories and packages, ... - it's ok. | What we want is artifacts (jars) to include certain 'type': SPI, plugins (impl), tests. | Maven should create these artifacts on the package (directory) name basis: e.g. org.jboss.[project].spi should be a part of [project]-spi.jar. Maven is not really set up to do this automatically, we could generate the separate artifacts using the assembly plugin, but there might be an issue with dependencies. For example, if [project]-plugins.jar has a dependency on another project, I don't think there is a way to differentiate it's dependencies from [project]-spi.jar. In other words, all the artifacts generated by the project share a pom, and therefor have the same dependencies. So [project]-spi would always include the same dependencies as [project]-plugin. For now, I will set it up to generate the multiple artifacts this way, and then if there are problems with dependencies, we can always change it later. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029939#4029939 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029939

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Generate html doc only

by julien＠jboss.com

If you write documentation you can generate HTML doc only which is way faster than generating the whole doc. ant lang.dochtml -Dlang=en View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029896#4029896 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029896

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Mavenizing docbook project

by pgier

Should I add this as a module to the parent pom, so that it can be built from the parent? There are also docs under kernel, should I add something similar to the kernel pom? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029880#4029880 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029880

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: Updating the server task to detect OutOfMemoryErrors

by ryan.campbell＠jboss.com

How is this supposed to be run between each test case? As it is, it could only be run at the end of a junit task, which is too little, too late. This is why it needs to be implemented by extending Ant's TestRunner. As for the implementation you have in the task itself (ie, the code which calls the mbean), this looks good. But let's get it in the right place first. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029865#4029865 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029865

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test cleanup in jboss5

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I want to go through the org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test package and drop all of the mq specific tests. I'm wondering if its worth keeping the jms agnostic tests as most of them seem to have been duplicated in the org.jboss.test.jbossmessaging.test package though. Maybe the better thing it just to merge any missing coverage. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029841#4029841 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029841

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-1437 RARMetaDataRepository

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : No, the problem is like I said initially when I wrote this class. | | The JAXB deployer helper shouldn't live in jboss-deployers.jar | because otherwise the JAXB jar will need to be in the bootstrap classpath | alongside jboss-deployers.jar | (not a problem for Java6 where it is in the JDK). | No need, If we are going to use JAXB 2.1 on JDK6 we will need to put the api jar in endorsed (they only bundle 2.0). -Jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029836#4029836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029836

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Mavenizing docbook project

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

I will use that for the security docbook project. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4029835#4029835 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4029835

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2007