[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Graphic Installer for Messaging
by timfox
"vladimir.ralev(a)jboss.com" wrote : We will support only those databases for which we have config files in jboss-messaging-1.2.0.GA\examples\config - mysql, mssql, portgre, sybase, db2 and oracle. (+hsql for non-clustered) If there is something else, let me know.
| [/quote}
|
| That's good. Although the db2 configuration is currently untested (can we put a warning by it saying so?)
|
| anonymous wrote :
| |
| | anonymous wrote : The question is, whether on not we want the user to be able to change these on install, or should we stick with the defaults?
| | I was hoping you would know :) . If you have any preferences about this comment here. We do have Advanced/Standard selector in the installer (standard is for the defaults). This Messaging Configuration diaog is displayed only if the user is in advanced mode.
|
Yes, I think we should add the settings on this page.
BTW How easy is it to tweak the installer when we add/change a config setting or database? Is it just some XML config that we need to change somwhere? If so, where?
Thx
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4027303#4027303
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4027303
19 years
[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Distributed lock manager
by bstansberry＠jboss.com
"manik.surtani(a)jboss.com" wrote : I'm thinking of something which can be swapped in place of the Pessimistic/OptimisticLockInterceptor (DistPess/OptLockInterceptors?) which in addition to obtaining local locks, uses a methodcall broadcast to replicate lock() methodcalls up remote stacks.
It would be nice to be able to make this more explicit and hence fine-grained. E.g. I have some data structure that maps to a subset of the tree. At the beginning of a tx I call lock("/session/123") which results in a broadcast, but thereafter no other actions I take that send out any cluster-wide messages. Assuming the lock() call results in a WL, the presence of the WL protects the rest of the subtree for the duration of the tx.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4027297#4027297
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4027297
19 years