April 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlaneInstance overwritten when creating startTaskInst

by kukeltje

It does not change the bahaviour. The behaviour you see is as designed. This is how you assign a task to an individual user from a pool of 'possible users'. If you set the actor to null again, it is 'assigned back' to the pool View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040468#4040468 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040468

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JACC Policy Bean not getting injected into EJBModule

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

The changes to the security deployer are ready. Now the components (web,ejb) do not do anything with jacc policy but the policy configuration lifecycle is surrounding the component lifecycles. I will be checking in the changes on Wednesday along with the security context changes. The top level jacc policy service bean is dependent on policy configuration facade service beans for the components and commits the parent when its subcomponents have all started. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040428#4040428 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040428

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Removing dependency on concurrent.jar

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I created a 2.0 branch and updated the trunk to a 2.2.0.SNAPSHOT that has no dependency on the oswego concurrent classes. Still need to validate the thread pool changes before a release can be made. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040427#4040427 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040427

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Should me make distinction on non XA connections

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

On the end, the XA separation didn't have anything to do with the transaction issue and JCA. But... maybe http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-945 still an issue or not. Should we fix it or not? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040421#4040421 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040421

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB (Repost)

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I just realized http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-410 was rejected. I thought it was fixed. I opened a new issue http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-946 linking both of them. I'm committing a proposed fix. Basically I'm doing this test within SessionAspect: public Object handleSend(Invocation invocation) throws Throwable | { | SessionState state = getState(invocation); | Object txID = state.getCurrentTxId(); | | if (state.isXA() && !(txID instanceof LocalTx) || (!state.isXA() && state.isTransacted())) | Both my integration tests and TCK worked with this change. I will run the testsuite now. For fixing this I tried also changing SessionState constructor, to not create the local transaction if XA (as it was the original version as I could see on history)... but then the txID existence was tide up with other sanity checks and I got exceptions in other places. I tried to fix those and some testcases were failing. The fix above was the less invasive as possible (without requiring much refactoring). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040419#4040419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040419

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I just realized http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-410 was rejected. I thought it was fixed. I opened a new issue http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-946 linking both of them. I'm committing a proposed fix. Basically I'm doing this test within SessionAspect: public Object handleSend(Invocation invocation) throws Throwable | { | SessionState state = getState(invocation); | Object txID = state.getCurrentTxId(); | | if (state.isXA() && !(txID instanceof LocalTx) || (!state.isXA() && state.isTransacted())) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040419#4040419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040419

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: OSGi Bundle Repository

by alesj

OK, first thing tomorrow in the morning. It's almost 2am here now ;-). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040398#4040398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040398

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: OSGi Bundle Repository

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040395#4040395 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040395

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: OSGi Bundle Repository

by alesj

The current 'work in progress' code is back into the MC - under OSGi module. Should I move this code there? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040380#4040380 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040380

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: OSGi Bundle Repository

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I added a https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/osgi/trunk/repository/ containing the OBR interfaces from felix since the current felix code would not compile for me. Its just a few interfaces. As we flesh this out any changes/feedback should be presented to the felix devs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040345#4040345 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040345

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2007