April 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting is throwing unrecognized listener ID: blah blah

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Ron, at the least change the log level to debug or trace for that. Trace the better. These WARN messages for listener ID are quite annoying. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040769#4040769 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040769

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Should me make distinction on non XA connections

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

We need to identify if there is any useCase for using JCA over non XA ConnectionFactories. The only one I can think of is connectionPool, as the user will be able to use ConnectionFactories directly. Weston, any idea? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040767#4040767 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040767

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I have executed the whole testsuite and I didn't see any failures related to transactional behaviors. And regarding to ACKs, I believe we should treat ACK on XA the as nonTransacted/AutoAck. For this, we would have to probably change SessionAspect::handlePreDeliver: | if (ackMode == Session.CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE) | { | // We collect acknowledgments in the list | | if (trace) { log.trace(this + " added to CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE list delivery " + info); } | | // Sanity check | if (info.getConnectionConsumerSession() != null) | { | throw new IllegalStateException( | "CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE cannot be used with a connection consumer"); | } | | state.getClientAckList().add(info); | } | else if (ackMode == Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE || | (state.isXA() && (state.getCurrentTxId() instanceof LocalTx))) | { | and postDeliver: public Object handlePostDeliver(Invocation invocation) throws Throwable | { | MethodInvocation mi = (MethodInvocation)invocation; | SessionState state = getState(invocation); | | int ackMode = state.getAcknowledgeMode(); | | // if XA and there is no transaction enlisted on XA we will act as AutoAcknowledge | if (ackMode == Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE || | (state.isXA() && state.getCurrentTxId() instanceof LocalTx)) | { | What is weird though is, I have written an integration testcase, where a message was received inside an EJB, and it looked like the message was ACKed even though I didn't have a transaction to commit it. I know Tim tried to explain me how this would work but now I got confused. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040766#4040766 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040766

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting is throwing unrecognized listener ID: blah blah

by timfox

http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040193#4040193 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040759#4040759 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040759

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: aop-mc-int tests with maven

by pgier

I added some profiles to allow each of the four groups of tests to be called from the command line. The groups can be called like this: | mvn -Dtests-weave test | or | mvn -Dtests-no-weave-secure | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040754#4040754 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040754

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting is throwing unrecognized listener ID: blah blah

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

When Client.addListener() is called, bisocket stores some information in a static map, keyed on the listener ID, and when Client.removeListener() is called, that information is purged. The "unrecognized listener ID" message comes up when the purge method doesn't find the listener ID among the keys. So it represents an event I didn't expect. However, I see one way the situation could arise. The client side runs a thread that monitors the health of the control connection, and if the control connection fails, the monitor thread will recreate the control connection. However, it could be that the failed control connection was to a server that died and was restarted (with new connections), in which case there's no point in restarting the old control connection. So the monitor thread keeps a count of the number of times the control connection has been restarted, and when the count maxes out, the thread gives up and purges the static map. If Client.addListener() is called after that, the message will come up. So I'm thinking 1. I'd like to leave the warning message in, but 2. I could leave a dummy entry in the map (instead of a Thread), just so it's clear that all is well. But, I'd like to know if this scenario corresponds to what you're seeing, or if there's something else going on that I need to fix. -Ron View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040752#4040752 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040752

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlaneInstance overwritten when creating startTaskInst

by kukeltje

correct, that is why it is a swimlane.... to have the opportunity to do it on a more generic level than one task View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040686#4040686 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040686

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: aop-mc-int tests with maven

by pgier

I tried using the option <useSystemClassLoader>true</useSystemClassLoader> | With this option turned on (and the -Djava.system.class.loader), the surefire booter is able to find the aop classloader. This allows some of the tests to succeed that were failing before. The problem is that this breaks some other tests. Maybe we can further divide the groups into tests that need the aop class loader and tests that don't. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040650#4040650 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040650

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlaneInstance overwritten when creating startTaskInst

by yoyoyoyo

"kukeltje" wrote : It does not change the bahaviour. The behaviour you see is as designed. This is how you assign a task to an individual user from a pool of 'possible users'. If you set the actor to null again, it is 'assigned back' to the pool Tks Ronald, but I already understood this part. The problem is with swimlaneInstance, which affects not only one peticular task but also all the tasks related to this swimlane. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040594#4040594 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040594

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - DependencyBuilder chain

by alesj

We should need some sort of a chain of DependencyBuilders. Since currently there is only AbstractDependencyBuilder or AOPDependencyBuilder. I added initial AnnotationDependecyBuilder (which isn't used at the moment) to check for Callback annotations. How should we join all the DependencyBuilders? btw: is this a good/proper way to handle annotations + dependencies? I still need to add annotation check after instantiation state - for beanfactory beans. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040589#4040589 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040589

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2007