May 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Binding proxy to Cache in AS JNDI

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Here's problem in a little more detail. The following is not really accurate; I'm avoiding some abstractions/indirections in the interest of clarity. The binding is done by an external mbean service, JRMPProxyFactory. It creates a proxy that implements the specified interface. Our goal is to expose Cache, so lets say it implements Cache. The proxy knows how to communicate with one of the AS' detached invokers (which one is a config detail of the JRMPProxyFactory.) When the client invokes a method, it sends back an Invocation object encapsulating the ObjectName of the service to call on, along with the method name and params. The detached invoker receives the Invocation and extracts the ObjectName, method name and args. It then does a call on the MBeanServer to invoke the given method. Problem is there is no mbean anywhere that exposes the Cache interface. Hence the detached invoker cannot make a call via the MBeanServer to any of the Cache methods. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050276#4050276 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050276

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - ESB Monitoring and Metrics : what should be monitored?

by tcunning

We're looking to put together a list of what should be monitored in the ESB, and are looking for suggestions. Burr put together a preliminary list, which I've posted below, but we're looking for suggestions of what would everyone would like to see. Burr's list : - What listeners/services are running? - Is the listener/service alive? - Recycle the listener/service - How many messages are waiting to be processed? - How old is the oldest message? Please feel free to suggest anything that you think would be useful. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050265#4050265 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050265

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Use of m2 jboss repository

by mlaporta

Thanks a lot for fast reply! Michele View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050190#4050190 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050190

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Use of m2 jboss repository

by pgier

"mlaporta" wrote : Hi all, | | My questions are : | | Is jboss m2 build going to cover Jboss3x also or should I upgrade? | There is no plan to build Jboss3x with maven, but you can use the artifacts that are in the central repository (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2), like you are doing now. "mlaporta" wrote : | Is the artifact layout different from the one I found for example on http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jboss/jboss-common | I mean can I use a dependency in the same way like | | | <dependency> | | <groupId>jboss</groupId> | | <artifactId>jboss-common</artifactId> | | <version>3.2.3</version> | | </dependency> | | | Looks like the layout is the same. I believe mvnrepository.com is just a front end for the central maven repo (http://repo1.maven.org). So you can use mvnrepository.com for browsing, but you don't need to point your build scripts to use that repo because they will automatically pull stuff from central. "mlaporta" wrote : | What is the difference from | http://repository.jboss.com/ | and | http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/ | Which one should I use? | You should use the second one (with the /maven2). The root folder is our ant repository, and it will eventually become legacy. "mlaporta" wrote : | I found different versioning for artifacts.For example on http://repository.jboss.com/jboss/common/ | I cannot find Jboss3x neither Jboss4x artifacts style. | Which is the version correspondence between artifacts like jboss-common 4.0.2 and the one I find on | http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/? | Yes, this is a problem because currently there is no automated synchronization between the jboss repository and the central maven repo. We're currently working on getting these two in sync, so that you will be able to find everything in either one. Hopefully this will be set up by the end of the month. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050185#4050185 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050185

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: task forms

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : there are 3 target audiences: process participants, managers and administrators | | administrators is the most important one to go into production. that kind fo functionality is what we have been lacking till now. that doesn't mean that we should present the task forms to admins. | | if a user only has the process participant role, he/she should not see the admin stuff and you should see an end user webapp. so for the process participants, the web app should be designed for end users to process their tasks. I believe that the requirements for participants/managers versus administrators are too different to unify into a single application. I also believe that any application we develop that is targeted towards participants/managers would at best be useful as a demo... I don't think that many organizations would want to use that application as-is. This is based on actual discussions with our sales engineers who deal with people using the product. If such an application is needed, it ought to be developed as a separate, simple jbpm-demo webapp that just provides the functions that were present in the prior console. Though by updating that application to use the jbpm4jsf component libraries, it could be greatly simplified. That said, the current console has very fine-tunable security. There are no hardcoded roles like "participant" for example; everything is configurable. Look at access.properties to see how to control access to just about any part of the application. You can remove entire sections of the application. For example, if an organization decides not to use the identity component, they can just block it in access.properties and the whole section disappears. Making actual action navigation depend on role is much more complicated. In addition it makes maintainability much more difficult because the multiple possible outcomes complicates testing exponentially. In my opinion, this kind of variable navigation is an indication that the application is trying to solve too many problems. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050184#4050184 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050184

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJB3 Alignment with JBoss Security

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

As part of JBoss Seam alignment with JBoss Security, I have been thinking of bringing the SPI into the 4.x world, such that integrators are shielded from the JBoss security internals. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050174#4050174 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050174

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: commons file upload dependency on commons io ?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

ah thanks ! JIT, i was just about to add it to the repo as apache-io phew. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050169#4050169 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050169

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: task forms

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : I by "broken" you mean "I didn't do that yet", yeah. It's not a finished product. I still have a good 8 or 9 items on my todo list yet. | with broken i mean that the content page remains empty when i click the task form link. "david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : No, I am against navigating to the task form. This application is not designed for end users to process their tasks; it is for the administration of a jBPM installation. | there are 3 target audiences: process participants, managers and administrators administrators is the most important one to go into production. that kind fo functionality is what we have been lacking till now. that doesn't mean that we should present the task forms to admins. if a user only has the process participant role, he/she should not see the admin stuff and you should see an end user webapp. so for the process participants, the web app should be designed for end users to process their tasks. if you are an admin, you should have all admin features and functionalities available. it should be based on the servlet security roles. as for the navigation, we should strive for 1 overall webapp + navigations so that based on the roles, some parts/columns/actions are just not displayed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050168#4050168 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050168

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Use of m2 jboss repository

by mlaporta

Hi all, I'm evaluating m2 porting for https://mobicents.dev.java.net. It use several jboss 3.x libs with different versionId http://mobicents-public.googlegroups.com/web/pom.xml and I would like to use jboss m2 repository to make them omogeneus. My questions are : Is jboss m2 build going to cover Jboss3x also or should I upgrade? Is the artifact layout different from the one I found for example on http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jboss/jboss-common I mean can I use a dependency in the same way like | <dependency> | <groupId>jboss</groupId> | <artifactId>jboss-common</artifactId> | <version>3.2.3</version> | </dependency> | What is the difference from http://repository.jboss.com/ and http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/ Which one should I use? I found different versioning for artifacts.For example on http://repository.jboss.com/jboss/common/ I cannot find Jboss3x neither Jboss4x artifacts style. Which is the version correspondence between artifacts like jboss-common 4.0.2 and the one I find on http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/? any advice/tips would appreciated Thanks Michele View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050166#4050166 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050166

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: commons file upload dependency on commons io ?

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

It's under the name jakarta-io. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050159#4050159 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4050159

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2007