May 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: First pass UI improvements

by julien＠jboss.com

In answer to thomas : anonymous wrote : Do we agree then to keep everything in Jira then ? | | Because as of now, there are 3 sources: | - THe original email | - the wiki page: | | https://wiki.corp.jboss.com/bin/view/SystemsEngineering/Portal2_6Usabilit... | - Jira | | I will have to spend quite some time to create JIRA tasks for the 40 | issues mentionned. Those JIRA tasks are a snashot of requirements: WIKI first pass -> JIRA tasks -> JIRA tasks Resolved Once it is done, Chris D. will produce a second pass if necessary. JIRA should not be used as a roadmap or a content system, it is software to keep track of evolution of the state of the project. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047143#4047143 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047143

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Looking up java:/JmsXA through HA-JNDI

by sergeypk

Dear Mr. Chief Cerberus Scientist, thank you for your detailed answer. I promise I will only be stupid when you are not looking in the future. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047134#4047134 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047134

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - receiveNoWait vs. receive(1L)

by sergeypk

In the clustered ejb test I'm working on, using MessageConsumer.receiveNoWait from the clustered EJB returns null even if there are messages waiting in the queue. If I change that to receive(1L), the consumer receives all the messages successfully. Is this a bug? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047127#4047127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047127

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Looking up java:/JmsXA through HA-JNDI

by adrian＠jboss.org

"sergeypk" wrote : | What could be the problem? Let's enumerate them shall we. 1) Asking a user question in a development forum 2) Asking a jndi question in a jms forum 3) Asking an FAQ All in all it shows you are totally unobservant and have made no attempt to understand or research the problem. To really answer your question (since I'm going to be nice for once, but pedantic :-) 1) What you should have noticed is that HAJNDI is a jndi issue and should therefore be asked in the asked in the JNDI forum http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=62086 Which has a "READ THIS FIRST" in block captials to get your attention, like the "DONT POST USER QUESTIONS HERE" that you ignored in this forum. 2) That helpful post has a link to the JNDI FAQ http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossNSFAQ 3) Which contains a common mistakes section like trying to lookup java:/ remotely (a clustered lookup via HAJNDI is a remote lookup - obviously) http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WhyDoIGetNameNotFoundException Hmm maybe the name of that FAQ might be relevant to your problem anyway? 4) Why you want to do a cluster lookup on a pool is beyond me anyway. It completely negates the point of pooling resources which is why the pool is only available locally. 5) Any jndi lookup from an ejb should be configured as a resource-ref http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=HowDoICreateAResourceRef 6) It is the JMSProvider that defines the JMS connection factory to use for the resource adapter. The pool is always local, the provider can use whatever jndi settings you like. http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfigJMSProvider 7) I got bored at this point. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047124#4047124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047124

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Looking up java:/JmsXA through HA-JNDI

by sergeypk

I'm working on the clustered EJB smoke test and I have a problem, as usual :) When I look up the connection factory (name java:/JmsXA) through plain JNDI, it works, but when looking it up through HA-JNDI, I get a NameNotFoundException. I thought that HA-JNDI should just delegate the look up to local JNDI if it can't find the name, but apparently that's not the case. What could be the problem? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047121#4047121 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047121

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: PROBLEM: No default VFS behavior

by adrian＠jboss.org

"mangokiwi" wrote : I *believe* that Equinox/Eclipse uses its own set of disjointed class loaders to implement its osgi bundling system. | What does that have to do with anything? JBoss inside Eclipse will either use the eclipse classloader (with no hotdeploy) like JBoss Embedded or it will bootstrap its own classloading (with no reference to eclipse classes). The issue is with the competition to define URLStreamHandlers something which should not be necessary with JBoss Embedded style deployments. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047110#4047110 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047110

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Issues with connection creating using JMSContainerInvoke

by adrian＠jboss.org

There is no seperate connection for (3). I don't know what you are seeing, but the sessions for delivery must be under the same connection as the connection consumer. SHOW EVIDENCE! The use of the DLQ connection (1) is really pretty redundant since it is only for JMS implementations that don't have DLQs themselves (like JBossMQ). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047107#4047107 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047107

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: First pass UI improvements

by chris.laprun＠jboss.com

I closed JBPORTAL-1403 since it's a duplicate of http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1397. This task is mostly finished. Just need to see what to do about the form labels. Please use this task instead of JBPORTAL-1403 for any comments. Better yet, any other changes to the WSRP GUI configuration tool should be requested in their own JIRA task for easier tracking. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047085#4047085 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047085

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - First pass UI improvements

by julien＠jboss.com

This thread takes care of grouping the first pass of the UI improvements, I created jira tasks for scoping them per kind of improvements : http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1402 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1403 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1404 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1405 The first thing to do is to estimate how long each will take and update the jira task accordingly: 1/ create a related jira task for each task to implement 2/ set the proper time to implement it on the task Second phase is implementation: 1/ each developer start with its task 2/ once a developer is done with all it task he will be assigned other tasks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047082#4047082 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047082

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Grouping of messages with JMSXGroupId(JBMESSAGING-375)

by timfox

I haven't forgotten about you, but I'm just maxed out getting 1.2.0.SP2 together. :) I will have a think about this after we release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047001#4047001 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047001

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2007