June 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: BUG: rendered not re-evaluated within ajax4jsf outputPan

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

Koen, this is an ESB developer forum and not the SEAM one. You need to post here http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&f=231 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055578#4055578 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055578

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - BUG: rendered not re-evaluated within ajax4jsf outputPanel

by koenhandekyn

i have an element inside an ajax4jsf outputPanel. i discovered that the rendered="/testcode/" test is not re-evaluated on a re-Render trigger from an ajax button. it feels to me like a bug. <a:outputPanel id="document_list_panel" ajaxRendered="true"> | | <h:outputText value="No documents to display" rendered="#{hits.rowCount==0}"/> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055571#4055571 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055571

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Permissions on temporary destinations (JBMESSAGING-994)

by sergeypk

"timfox" wrote : When you say "access" do you mean send messages to, or consume messages from? I have only tried consuming, but I don't have any reason to believe that sending would be different. Using SecurityTest settings, for example, if I login as user guest, and call createTemporaryQueue, the queue has default permissions requiring role "def" to read/write to it (verified under a debugger). User guest doesn't have role "def". "timfox" wrote : anonymous wrote : 2) Disallow creating temporary destinations that the logged-in user will not be able to use - doesn't solve the actual problem. | | | | Which user are you referring to? The creator of the temp destination, or the consumer? The creator. "timfox" wrote : anonymous wrote : | | 3) Have some configuration mechanism for temporary destination permissions - not sure where it would go, to make it sufficiently flexible. | | | | Temp destination security could be overridden in the connection factory. That's where the other temp destination attributes are overridden. But this means that different users will all use the same temp destination security? Is this ok? Shouldn't the temp destination permissions be configurable on a per-user basis? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055569#4055569 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055569

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - redirect to an external URL from an action

by koenhandekyn

hello all, anybody has a tip on how to redirect to an external URL from a seam action? as it ' seams ' :) like a very common requirement I guess there should be some elegent way foreseen but I didn't find any (yet) the path i'm thinking about is to make a redirect page that takes in a parameter with the target URL. kind regards koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055568#4055568 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055568

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Permissions on temporary destinations (JBMESSAGING-994)

by timfox

"sergeypk" wrote : Currently, temporary destinations are assigned the default security configuration when they are created. This means that if I log in as a user who has less permissions than required by the default security configuration, and create a temporary destination, I can't access it afterwards. | When you say "access" do you mean send messages to, or consume messages from? anonymous wrote : | Something should be done about it. Here are some options: | | 1) Skip permission checks on temporary destinations. Bad because there's a possibility of DoS attacks if someone guesses the temp destination name. | | Not a good idea. But the issue is not about guessing the temp destination name. A valid use case would be sending messages to a topic with JMSReplyTo set, and only some users have rights to respond on the reply to destination. In this case no guessing is necessary. anonymous wrote : | 2) Disallow creating temporary destinations that the logged-in user will not be able to use - doesn't solve the actual problem. | Which user are you referring to? The creator of the temp destination, or the consumer? anonymous wrote : | 3) Have some configuration mechanism for temporary destination permissions - not sure where it would go, to make it sufficiently flexible. | Temp destination security could be overridden in the connection factory. That's where the other temp destination attributes are overridden. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055562#4055562 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055562

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.endTransaction handli

by dimitris＠jboss.org

| try | { | // Marked rollback | if (tx.getStatus() == Status.STATUS_MARKED_ROLLBACK) | { | tx.rollback(); | } | else | { | // Commit tx | // This will happen if | // a) everything goes well | // b) app. exception was thrown | tx.commit(); | } | In the case of an asynchronous rollback (timeout) the tx status is STATUS_ROLLEDBACK and so the commit causes: | 12:35:09,391 ERROR [LogInterceptor] TransactionRolledbackException in method: pu | blic abstract void org.jboss.test.tm.interfaces.TxTimeout.testOverriddenTimeoutE | xpires() throws java.rmi.RemoteException, causedBy: | java.lang.IllegalStateException: [com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjuna | core.inactive] [com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.inactive] The | transaction is not active! | at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionImple.c | ommit(TransactionImple.java:223) | at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.endTransaction(TxInterceptorCM | T.java:502) | at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxIntercep | Shouldn't the commit happen only is status is STATUS_ACTIVE ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055559#4055559 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055559

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Permissions on temporary destinations (JBMESSAGING-994)

by sergeypk

Currently, temporary destinations are assigned the default security configuration when they are created. This means that if I log in as a user who has less permissions than required by the default security configuration, and create a temporary destination, I can't access it afterwards. Something should be done about it. Here are some options: 1) Skip permission checks on temporary destinations. Bad because there's a possibility of DoS attacks if someone guesses the temp destination name. 2) Disallow creating temporary destinations that the logged-in user will not be able to use - doesn't solve the actual problem. 3) Have some configuration mechanism for temporary destination permissions - not sure where it would go, to make it sufficiently flexible. Any ideas? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055557#4055557 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055557

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Out-of-the-Box Integration of 2.6 with JBoss AS 4.2

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

It was not a requirement it was a choice between maintaining 2 source trees to use the correct jar embedded with AS, or add the jboss-backport-library into JBoss Portal so that the same source code can be used for Jboss AS 4.0.x and 4.2.x I added jboss-backport-concurrent.jar in jboss portal distribution so now this part is fixed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055521#4055521 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055521

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Out-of-the-Box Integration of 2.6 with JBoss AS 4.2

by julien＠jboss.com

what is the problem with the backport concurrent library that requires to maintain 2 source trees ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055511#4055511 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055511

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBoss used in Clinical Trials Management?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

also, jbpm is neutral to the domain where it is applied. you have to give your processes as input. so it can handle any domain, including medical and healthcare apps. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055504#4055504 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4055504

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2007