July 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build

by julien＠jboss.com

the point is that while waiting that someone provide us the perfect build we should reimplement what we have today using simple ANT stuff and IVY (which allow to declare dependencies). what we need for now seems quite simple, why should't at least try to spend a couple of days on it in order to get a build that works, that is easy to understand and is documented. "julien(a)jboss.com" wrote : when we look at it, our build stuff is not much complicated since we remove the processing of xdoclet. | | Beside: | | 1/ compile java code | 2/ assemble prepare file structures with token replacements | 3/ create archives | | or | | 1/ prepare test archives | 2/ execute tests | | what else do we need ? | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062203#4062203 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062203

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build

by julien＠jboss.com

when we look at it, our build stuff is not much complicated since we remove the processing of xdoclet. Beside: 1/ compile java code 2/ assemble prepare file structures with token replacements 3/ create archives or 1/ prepare test archives 2/ execute tests what else do we need ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062200#4062200 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062200

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build

by chris.laprun＠jboss.com

One thing that annoys the hell out of me with our current build that lots of tasks cannot be run into isolation. You have to run some other task before. Obviously, which task(s) and their order is not documented... A simple yet efficient improvement would be to have the concept of private/public tasks. Private tasks that cannot be run in isolation should be have named prefixed with "__" for example. Tasks with normal looking names should be able to be run in isolation and documented as to what they do. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062199#4062199 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062199

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build

by chris.laprun＠jboss.com

We certainly cannot afford to spent a couple of man-month into migrating to maven... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062197#4062197 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062197

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Strange problem of aspectizing EJBs

by vola

Hi all, My jboss: 4.0.5 GA. JDK:1.5.0.12. JBoss AOP 1.5.5. I have done all configuration tutorial asks to run AOP. Also, I have successfully run "injbossaop" example. I tried to modify "Duke's Bank" J2EE application of Sun to use loadtime weaving. It is very strange that I could successfully aspectize the methods of "Servlets", but fail when aspectizing EJBs. My jboss-aop.xml: | <typedef name="MyServlets" expr="class($instanceof{javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet})"/> | <bind pointcut="execution(* $typedef{MyServlets}->service(..))"> | <interceptor class="com.sun.ebank.aop.SimpleInterceptor2"/> | </bind> | | <typedef name="MySessionBeans" expr="class($instanceof{javax.ejb.SessionBean})" /> | <bind pointcut="execution(* $typedef{MySessionBeans}->withdraw(..))"> | <interceptor class="com.sun.ebank.aop.SimpleInterceptor2"/> | </bind> | | <bind pointcut="execution(* com.sun.ebank.ejb.tx.TxControllerBean->withdraw(..))"> | <interceptor class="com.sun.ebank.aop.SimpleInterceptor2"/> | </bind> | | <bind pointcut="execution(com.sun.ebank.ejb.tx.TxControllerBean->new(..))"> | <interceptor class="com.sun.ebank.aop.SimpleInterceptor2"/> | </bind> | | <bind pointcut="all(com.sun.ebank.ejb.tx.*)"> | <interceptor class="com.sun.ebank.aop.SimpleInterceptor2"/> | </bind> | As you can see, I tried different ways to aspectize the EJBs. But only the first binding "MyServlets" can be aspectized. (SimpleInterceptor2.class prints out debug msg) In the "injbossaop" example, it aspectizes "ExampleSessionBean.class" with no problem. Could anyone have any ideas what I should do to make JBoss AOP work with EJBs, please? Thank you View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062190#4062190 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062190

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Uniquely identifying services and actions

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

I'm not sure EPR is the way to go as a Service can have multple EPRs, and you can have multiple Service instances listen to the same EPR. In my opinion we need to pick unique names for our actions within a deployment, as you'd like to do reporting on which specific instance is troublesome, not which (potentially distributed) service. Action names are required in the jbossesb-1.0.1 xsd. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062151#4062151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062151

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Remoting 3 API Mockup/prototype

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Anonymous svn link is at: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/sandbox/david.lloyd/remoting3/api-proto View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062148#4062148 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062148

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: @JMX aspect and aop/mc integration

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

OK. I've closed JBMICROCONT-109. If you ever want to resurrect AUTO, let me know. I spent a couple hours on it and did a fair bit before I began dreading all the unit tests of DynamicMBean validation. I kept a copy of that stuff. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062127#4062127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062127

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Uniquely identifying services and actions

by mark.little＠jboss.com

A service can be uniquely identified by its EPR. Trouble is that multiple EPRs can point to the same service. Ignoring that for a sec, could you use the EPR? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062122#4062122 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062122

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: What is going on with aliases?

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : I'll change the order of DeploymentAliasMetaDataDeployer by renaming it to AliasMetaDataDeployer. | Not that it matters in state machine ;-), but I think it is less confusing. | This way 2nd deployment will resolve the alias bean right away. Bad choice, since that way the joined-beans.xml test case doesn't work. In order to have AliasMDDeployer after BeanMDDeployer we need to run resolveContexts() on the Controller, checking if some existing beans get resolved due to 'added' context. But I don't see the equivalent behavior on the removal of the alias. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4062118#4062118 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4062118

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2007