August 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Portal Documentation] - Re: jboss portal 2.6.1 and AS 4.0 x

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

where do you see the tutorials you talk about ? 2.6.1 runs with either JBoss AS 4.0.5 or JBoss AS 4.2.1 If you have the choice go with JBoss AS 4.2.1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078849#4078849 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078849

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal Documentation] - jboss portal 2.6.1 and AS 4.0 x

by jjoo

Is portal 2.6.1 running in the AS 4.0.x? There are so many information including tutorials for AS 4.0 x but not much for 4.2.1GA. Thanks, Jae Joo View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078846#4078846 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078846

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - JBossWeb & Property Substitution In server.xml

by jiwils

Currently, JBossWeb can handle system property substitution in server.xml. It is used for the bind address. However, it can't handle ${property:default} syntax. Is there a specific reason this was left out of the code base? If not, adding it would mean that we would be one step closer to have system properties for every port in JBoss AS, and once we have that, we can get rid of the SBM. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078839#4078839 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078839

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: Removal of JBossTM from JBossAS trunk

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Yes, you can embed JBossTS in a range of application servers or containers. As Bill said though, it may need some bespoke code to do it. Plus, it's always been designed to run stand-alone. As for the old JBossTM project, I'm still waiting for something back from Francisco on that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078832#4078832 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078832

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Redesign extended persistence context

by wolfc

The spec doesn't state the intention of an extended persistence context. It only states the rules of a SFSB, entity and persistence context. Given those rules an entity drawn from a xpc and directly refered (from a field) by a SFSB must act as I said. The only thing said about an extended persistence context is that it's life cycle is not bound by a transaction, but by the SFSBs that use it (JPA 3.3). Why would you want to keep managed entities around? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078819#4078819 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078819

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Redesign extended persistence context

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

I don't think your interpretation is correct. Otherwise, extended PC would be entirely useless. The whole point of extended PC is to keep managed objects around. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078764#4078764 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078764

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Redesign extended persistence context

by wolfc

If passivation implies serialization then according to JPA spec the entity becomes detached. EJB 3 4.2.1 allows for a reference to a serializable object, not a keep-alive managed entity. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078760#4078760 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078760

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: identity module detached

by sohil.shah＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | yes, I think its a good moment to start migrating sso. We can create additional submodule for it. | +1 anonymous wrote : | I don't know if we want/need to bundle thirdparty jars for JOSSO/CAS with portal by default so we could also think about something optional and plugable | Agreed as well. Currently, the integration has the following structure: identity/{sso framework/config (for the framework's configuration files to be deployed) and identity/{sso framework}/lib (for any libraries/jar files needed by the framework to be deployed and at compile time). The portal integration code is in the org.jboss.portal.identity.auth package. See the following branch for details: https://svn.jboss.org/repos/portal/branches/2_6_CAS_Integration All this can be rolled into an sso submodule under identity main module Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078750#4078750 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078750

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Redesign extended persistence context

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

This doesn't seem right....Entities become detached before/after passivation/activation of a SFSB? This means you cannot have any managed entities as fields of your SFSB, or rather it is unreliable to do so if your container may passivate. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078745#4078745 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078745

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Common project dependency

by adrian＠jboss.org

I've fixed the dependency on jboss-common-core to be 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT instead of 2.0.3.GA from the jboss-vfs dependency. Similar to this problem: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4077827#4077827 This fixes the failing tests where the container tests couldn't find the javabean schema. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078742#4078742 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078742

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2007