August 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: Removal of JBossTM from JBossAS trunk

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

I think it needs some massaging, but the Arjuna stuff is pretty embeddable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078726#4078726 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078726

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Removal of JBossTM from JBossAS trunk

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Adrian has already specified the removal of JBossTM from JBossAS trunk here: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4516 This is however scheduled for GA. I think it would make a lot more sense to perform those tasks at an earlier Beta or CR release. Another question is what happens to the JBossTM project. Remove it entirely? Franscisco wanted to fork the project at sourceforge at some point. Is there any usecase that would require a standalone/embedded JBossTM? (e.g. with JBossCache) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078676#4078676 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078676

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - common.text package update

by julien＠jboss.com

I worked on the common.text package in order to: 1/ introduce concept of CharWriter (similar to java.lang.CharSequence but for write operations). 2/ introduce CharEncoder which defines an interface for encoding char stream to char stream. 3/ reimplement FastURLEncoder in a more reliable and faster way (java.netURLEncoder is broken and slow). 4/ implement FastURLDecoder for decoding x-www-formurl-encoded strings in a reliable and fast way (java.netURLDecoder is broken and slow). 5/ added TextTools (similar to other XXXTools). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078671#4078671 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078671

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Redesign extended persistence context

by wolfc

Passivation/activation isn't a problem, because by definition we only passivate if the entities are serializable (EJB 3 4.2) and we treat the entity as a serializable object. Thus the entity becomes detached after activation (JPA 3.2.4). All working according to spec. Replication is a problem. Not so much for a transaction scoped persistence context, because you can only replicate over transactions and not within. Thus the entities becomes detached. But I agree that a XPC has a problem if a SFSB keeps a reference to an entity. As long as we do a passivation/activation cycle during replication, we're okay because the first paragraph applies. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078636#4078636 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078636

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: identity module detached

by bdaw

yes, I think its a good moment to start migrating sso. We can create additional submodule for it. I don't know if we want/need to bundle thirdparty jars for JOSSO/CAS with portal by default so we could also think about something optional and plugable. I don't remember how SSO integration fit in at the moment. Sohil? For the testsuite, Prabhat is on it and we should have a hudson task this soon. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078632#4078632 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078632

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Virtual hosts and multiple portal server instances

by julien＠jboss.com

The most important thing to do is to define the mapping semantic of virtual hosting. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078626#4078626 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078626

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: identity module detached

by julien＠jboss.com

Good job Bolek, that was not an easy thing to do. Sohil we should think about migrating the sso stuff to this module. What is the status for the test suite of identity ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078625#4078625 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078625

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Contributing back to the jBPM community - business calen

by stevenl

Thanks for the prompt reply Tom. I have a number of unit tests that test the business time duration functionality. The unit test class as well as the new BusinessTime class (that contains the methods used to calculate the business time duration) are ready for review/ contribution. I will email you to obtain further instructions. Regards, Steven View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078597#4078597 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078597

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Virtual hosts and multiple portal server instances

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

Glad we are on the same page. Did you see this thread: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=112843 As i hear you, you would be users of such features, and i think we should get this ready before virtual hosting makes total sense. (i agree that virtual hosting can still be used without the notion of community, but in very few cases) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078595#4078595 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078595

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ORA-014161 - Help with Bug on Oracle Driver

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I'm not sure what is the version (I will find out about that tomorrow during business hours... I'm using a node from our QA department)... The problem is related to the Insert with Select.. and the Blob is on the Select clause... It looks like Oracle don't support binding blob values on a Select? (which is kind of weird though). For now (I mean... for CR2).. I'm ignoring duplicate keys on the storeMessage method.. I will look for a way to change it before GA. Thanks a lot... Clebert Ps: I will update the thread when I have discovered the versions... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4078572#4078572 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4078572

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2007