January 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: JBoss module/jar naming

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Regarding the jboss repo location, I just forgot that the names were not consistent with the mvn artifact name. Where it exists, it should be consistent. Another thing to look at is using only the mvn repo and integrating into non-mvn builds using the various ant to mvn integration tasks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119353#4119353 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119353

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: JBoss module/jar naming

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Sure enough, I forgot to quote: | <componentref name="jboss/aop" version="2.0.0.CR1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/cache" version="2.1.0.CR2"/> | <componentref name="jboss/common-core" version="2.2.3.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/common-logging-jdk" version="2.0.2.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/common-logging-log4j" version="2.0.2.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/common-logging-spi" version="2.0.2.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/integration" version="5.0.0.Beta4"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jaxr" version="1.2.0.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-ejb3-cache" version="0.11.1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-ejb3-ext-api" version="0.1.2.Beta1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-ejb3-impl" version="0.1.2.Beta1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-ha-client" version="1.0.0.BETA1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-ha-server-api" version="1.0.0.BETA2-SNAPSHOT"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-jaspi-api" version="1.0-BETA1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-javaee" version="5.0.0.Beta3Update1"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-security-spi" version="2.0.2.Beta3"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jbosssx" version="2.0.2.Beta3"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jbosssx-client" version="2.0.2.Beta3"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jbossts" version="4.3.0.BETA2"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jboss-vfs" version="2.0.0.Beta6"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jbossws-native50" version="2.0.2.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jbossxb" version="2.0.0.CR5"/> | <componentref name="jboss/jms-integration-tests" version="1.0.1.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/messaging" version="1.4.0.SP3"/> | <componentref name="jboss/metadata" version="1.0.0.Beta5"/> | <componentref name="jboss/microcontainer" version="snapshot"/> | <componentref name="jboss/profiler/jvmti" version="1.0.0.CR5"/> | <componentref name="jboss/remoting" version="2.2.2.SP3-brew"/> | <componentref name="jboss/serialization" version="1.0.3.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/test" version="1.0.4.GA"/> | <componentref name="jboss/web" version="2.1.0.CR11"/> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119346#4119346 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119346

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - JBoss module/jar naming

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Nothing too important but we don't have a consistent naming convention for jboss modules. Going forward, can we come up with something consistent: In the legacy repository some modules appear like jboss/xxx others jboss/jboss-xxx, yet others jboss/jbossxxx: View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119345#4119345 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119345

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Refactoring ServerPeer

by timfox

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I have made the JBMESSAGING-1189 changes in Branch_Stable. What would a release of this be tagged as? AFAIK we have one other task we need to do for the AS 5.0 integration: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-1089 When do you need a release by? I'm thinking it would probably be best to get this other task done too, saves us doing another release later. We should probably call the release 1.4.1. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119333#4119333 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119333

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Naming Exception from Embedded

by timfox

"pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : Another JMS/Embedded problem. This is using the beta3 tag of AS5, so JBM 1.4.0.SP1-brew. That's old, 1.4.0.SP3 is the latest and what is in EAP 4.3. anonymous wrote : | [testng] DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.destination.TopicService] Creating jboss.mq.destination:service=Topic,name=testTopic | jboss,mq? You're using the old JBoss MQ names? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119331#4119331 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119331

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Refactoring ServerPeer

by timfox

Most of the tests on Branch_Stable seem to be failing now. It seems to be related to these latest changes. http://dev45.qa.atl.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBM%20Stable/job/JBMS-mysql-msg... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119329#4119329 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119329

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossGenericBeanMetaData for @Stateful

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I have updated the test to expect a JBossSessionBeanMetaData in the merged result. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119305#4119305 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119305

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossGenericBeanMetaData for @Stateful

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The JBoss50UnitTestCase.testEjbthree936 conflicts with the usage fixed as part of http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMETA-1. A SessionBeanMetaData merged with a JBossGenericBeanMetaData now produces a JBossSessionBeanMetaData. We can't support both uses. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119302#4119302 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119302

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Kosmos] - Still Active?

by redcoat

Is Kosmos still active? cheers, David View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119293#4119293 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119293

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: ClassNotFoundException on Server Startup

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

JBoss AOP 2.0.0.CR3 has been released today. Thanks to Jason Greene's help, I have found out that the problem was being caused by an incompatibility with JBoss AOP 2.0.0.Beta1, which requires recompilation of Pojo Cache. Before this recompilation, the JBoss AOP version cannot be upgraded in the AS. Kabir and Jason are coordinatinating our AOP release with a new release of PojoCache for that matter. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119278#4119278 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119278

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2008