[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?
by alessio.soldano@jboss.com
Here are my 2 cents:
"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : ... and if only native changes we would have redundant releases?
|
| * jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.4
| * jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0
| * jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0
Not sure if this might be convenient in practice, however what about doing the following way if we choose the verbose option?
- native only changes
* jbossws-2.1.0-native-2.0.4
* jbossws-2.1.0-metro-1.0.0
* jbossws-2.1.0-cxf-1.0.0
i.e. we release jbossws-2.1.0-native-2.0.4 only
- framework/spi/common only changes
* jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.3
* jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0
* jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0
i.e. we release all, without changing the stack release number
- framework/spi/common changes + native changes
* jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.4
* jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0
* jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0
i.e. we release all, also changing the native stack release number
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119074#4119074
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119074
18 years, 2 months