Sure, I think that would be useful on a number of levels:
1. From a users perspective, it'd be easier to add new transports.
2. From a project perspective, it'd easier to maintain the related code in this area.
I looked at this a while ago, playing around with annotations on the EPR classes for defining the protocols supported by that EPR, plus an "ArtifactFactory" for creating Courier and EPR instances associated with these transports. More however would be needed in the area of the listener configs i.e. supporting the config mappings in an extensible way, or eliminating the need to do mappings all together (the ultimate goal!!).
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118990#4118990
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118990
It looks like this is a blocker for further work on the JTS. Unlike the JTA, the JTS depends on the CORBA ORB. The ORB is in deploy, which means the JTS has to move there too. Although I can test the POJO JTA version by moving it into bootstrap temporarily, we need both JTA and JTS working before the next JBossTS release. Hence if JBAS-5103 has to be deferred past beta4, a new transactions release will likely do the same.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118967#4118967
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118967
Hi,
I'm new to Portals in general, and am trying to understand how permissioning usually works. I don't believe it's part of JSR-168? If not, does every Portal server implement it differently?
For example, I've looked at Liferay a little, and see that it has the concepts of Organizations, Locations etc.. Does JBoss Portal have similar concepts? Use different concepts?
We would like to be as portable as possible across Portal servers, in case we are forced to switch. What is the best way to achieve this when it comes to setting up permissioning?
cheers,
David
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118901#4118901
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118901