November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by vblagojevic＠jboss.com

I was able to recreate this in my own bare jgroups tests. I made a test where 4 members join and do a separate getState. The test does this repeatedly 10 times. Having loopback true fails at least on of these 10 runs. Having loopback false gives much better performance. I have isolated the problem and I am testing a fix that would handle this problem regardless of loopback being turned of or on! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188144#4188144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188144

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: VFS Permissions - JBMICROCONT-149

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Currently, the classloader system is the issue to get AS5 working under a security manager. Your approach of security.xml did the same (introduction of SM after the CL). file:/some/directory/my.jar/sub.jar is still being opened and its permissions read by the Policy implementation. This is where we have issues. We cannot read the vfs urls and the introduction of the VFS handlers into bootstrap is unknown territory at the moment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188139#4188139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188139

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Netty exception in Hudson run

by trustin

Yes they are identical AFAIK. Snapshot 5 was r457: http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/Netty/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188138#4188138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188138

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why does DeleteEncoding need a queue id? (Repost)

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

That was added during the XA work. Case the server is restarted after the transaction was prepared, and before the commit was done, we need to replay the transaction (removing references), and we need the QueueID for that. Look at JournalStorageManager::loadPreparedTransactions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188136#4188136 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188136

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why does DeleteEncoding need a queue id?

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

That was added during the XA work. Case the server is restarted after the commit was prepared, and before the commit was done, we need to replay the transaction (removing references), and we need the QueueID for that. Look at JournalStorageManager::loadPreparedTransactions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188136#4188136 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188136

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Netty exception in Hudson run

by timfox

Are they identical? The reason I query this is that Hudson ran pretty much 100% fine over the weekend on 3.0.1 snapshot 5, but then when you changed it to 3.0.1.GA, we got a few failures shortly after that. It could just be chance, but it seemed a little odd. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188123#4188123 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188123

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Netty exception in Hudson run

by trustin

They are same. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188121#4188121 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188121

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Fine grained permissions

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I'd keep it simple for now and just have simple ids and don't worry about the action | (i.e. just have '*' meaning all) | The only complication is making sure aliases get resolved to their real id. | The id may eventually be expanded to regular expressions or globbing? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188119#4188119 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188119

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Fine grained permissions

by adrian＠jboss.org

WRT to this post http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187521#4187521 where Ales asked me to raise the JIRA issue. We need to decide what we are going to do first. This should be similar to the MBeanPermission http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/management/MBeanPermission.... where the permission has both an id and an action. I'd keep it simple for now and just have simple ids and don't worry about the action (i.e. just have '*' meaning all) The only complication is making sure aliases get resolved to their real id. Longer term, we'd probably want even more fine grained control for actions i.e. differentiate create, inject, install and invoke and probably registering an event listener (others?) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188118#4188118 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188118

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5953; jar override issue

by sacha.labourey＠jboss.com

If we find no good solution with the JDK layer, why not checking at boot time whether a suitable JBoss Native library has been installed and use that instead? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188113#4188113 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4188113

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008