November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Labs] - Feeds not working 2

by ShaunA

when I go to latest blog feed I get « Back to feed:   ----------------------------^ They appear to be broken again. Shaun View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190812#4190812 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190812

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

ProcessDefinition + ProcessInstance is what I meant with 'as is'. So I agree with Bernd as well ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190809#4190809 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190809

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - New Embedded Prototype

by ALRubinger

I've committed new jboss-embedded projects: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/embedded/trunk/ This is defined by: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EMB-17 Included in this initial setup is a prototype of JBoss Embedded AS distribution which packages up AS and a few Embedded-specific classes into a single JAR, and successfully starts the AS Bootstrap. Some points: * Tangential to this is refactoring of the bootstrap project as defined by JBBOOT-4, where the common server locations (JBOSS_HOME, deploy, lib, etc) must be represented by VFS instead of java.io.File. This is required to get a server contained within a JAR. * Embedded should really have no common server locations - it's got all of its binaries on the classpath and should be able to boot straight from there. * I had to introduce a NoOpClassLoadingFactory to ignore any roots defined by classloading elements within the AS bootstrap. Due to the repackaging, these roots are not (and shouldn't be) found in the form they're listed. This furthers the notion that Embedded runs within a host ClassLoader. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190807#4190807 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190807

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

I agree with Bernd. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190804#4190804 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190804

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Thanks Bernd, more votes? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190791#4190791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190791

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM examples and configurations in JBoss AS 5

by timfox

The fact that the examples all use different destinations tells me they haven't been run before on previous releases for JBoss AS 5, e.g. 1.4.1.CR1. All examples should *always be run* as part of the release process. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190788#4190788 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190788

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Remoting 3: Secure Remote Classloading (JBREM-929)

by alesj

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Make sense? | Yup. I figured it was something like that. I'll restructure VFS project so we can have something like this: - vfs core-spi - vfs core-impl - vfs remoting - vfs cache - vfs ... But only after I get 2.0.0.GA out. Which should be these days. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190783#4190783 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190783

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: profileservice-testTopic-service.xml deployment failures

by emuckenhuber

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I cleaned up the deployment code in the test layer to properly cleanup the failed test as this was causing every other test to fail due to the previous incomplete deployment. | | We either need | - a fix from messaging, not likely as the code is ready to go out the door | - exclude this property | Okay thanks for cleaning up the deployment code, i thought i already did the the undeployment so that it does not cause any further regressions - that was not the intention. Well basically the problem with this attribute was after persisting and restarting AS, as the default attributes are also persisted. Maybe we should have a way to exclude attributes or just persist the changed ones. But i guess this depends on the MO<->xml marshalling/unmarshalling first. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190777#4190777 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190777

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Multiple matching files by name in parsing deployer

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Without a jboss-structure.xml excluding a jar from the meta-inf bucket, you can't. We can't both treat WEB-INF/lib as a source for deployment descriptors and know when not to do so without some user input. | I was thinking more about it yesterday and you're absolutely right. What eventually triggered my check, was when I was getting unexpected web-beans.xml -- > WBMD. But it was only unexpected since I missed some detail. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190775#4190775 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190775

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | Anil... are you sure this won't affect performance? We must do a before and after performance check before applying those changes. If it's detrimental to performance it's a no go and we'll have to find some other way. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190770#4190770 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190770

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008