December 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1607 Update EJB3.0 Tutorials

by ALRubinger

"jaikiran" wrote : Andrew, I heard that we already have some similar stuff for starting the server through Maven. Could you please point me to that? http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/maven/plugins/jbossas/trunk/ It's the "example" project which has a POM to show a working configuration. I meant to release this awhile ago, if I remember correctly there was some issue in starting AS from a JBOSS_HOME with spaces in the path under Win32. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195217#4195217 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195217

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ConsumerTest Hudson intermittent failure

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

One very minor thing on that test, assertEquals(0, result); ... the first parameter should aways be the expected value, and the second the result. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195201#4195201 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195201

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ConsumerTest Hudson intermittent failure

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I thought it was failing because of asynchronous calls to ACK, but I made a change and still fails. On way to easily replicate this is doing this: | org.jboss.messaging.tests.integration.consumer.ConsumerTest | | public void testConsumerAckImmediateAckIgnored() throws Exception | { | for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) | { | internaltestConsumerAckImmediateAckIgnored(); | tearDown(); | setUp(); | } | } | | private void internaltestConsumerAckImmediateAckIgnored() throws Exception | { | | ClientSessionFactory sf = new ClientSessionFactoryImpl(new TransportConfiguration("org.jboss.messaging.core.remoting.impl.invm.InVMConnectorFactory")); | | sf.setBlockOnAcknowledge(true); | sf.setBlockOnNonPersistentSend(true); | sf.setBlockOnPersistentSend(true); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195200#4195200 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195200

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - JBAS-6297, mbean service optional injection

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I'm not understanding the current mc optional dependency implementation. I expected that I could simply leverage an optional notion from AbstractDependencyItem to update the ServiceInjectionValueMetaData.visit method to create an optional dependency like: | public void visit(ServiceMetaDataVisitor visitor) | { | ServiceControllerContext context = visitor.getControllerContext(); | Object name = context.getName(); | ControllerState whenRequired = visitor.getContextState(); | | boolean optional = isOptional(); | DependencyItem item = new AbstractDependencyItem(name, dependency, whenRequired, dependentState, optional); | visitor.addDependency(item); | | visitor.visit(this); | } | But optionality does not exist in AbstractDependencyItem. It only exists in a protected OptionalDependencyItem which is an inner class of the AbstractDependencyValueMetaData class. Why isn't this a general DependencyItem notion? I guess I'll look at updating the ServiceInjectionValueMetaData.getValue to return null and see what additional changes are needed to deal with that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195198#4195198 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195198

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM 2.0 Strict ordering via ordering groups

by gaohoward

About performance: for each ordering group, it needs to have a sorted list to store message refs yet to be delivered, and for each message to deliver, it needs to check if the message is at the front of the list, if not, detain the delivery. About the cluster: if there are a cluster Q on two nodes, M1 is sent to node1 and M2 to node2. If node1 dies when M1 is delivering, M1 will be moved to node2 for delivery. It need to make sure M2 will never be delivered until M1 is delivered, but who receives M1 or M2, doesn't matter. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195197#4195197 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195197

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Pluggable @EJB Resolvers

by ALRubinger

"wolfc" wrote : That does not resolve. | @Remote interface MyBusinessRemote extends MyCommon | Now what? You've undefined semantics. In that case you've got to override @EJB(beanInterface) to something worthwhile, else you get NonDeterministicInterfaceException. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195184#4195184 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195184

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Pluggable @EJB Resolvers

by wolfc

That does not resolve. @Remote interface MyBusinessRemote extends MyCommon Now what? You've undefined semantics. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195182#4195182 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195182

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Internal Benchmarking] - SPECjAppServer2004Setup for Jboss 5.0.0

by deepalk

Hi There, I am a PhD student at Georgia Tech , as part of my research work I would like to run SPEC benchmark on Jboss application server. I used [1] the document for Jboss 4.0.X and I got everything working (since I used latest version of MySQL , I had to change some of the source code). But Now I would like to get that working on Jboss 5.0.0 , I tried but still no luck. So do you have any idea to update those doc for Jboss 5.0.0 ? , of could you please help me to get the SPEC benchmark working on Jboss 5.0. As I can see there are number of configuration changes from 4.0.X to 5.0.0 [1] : http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-11982 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195179#4195179 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195179

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Pluggable @EJB Resolvers

by ALRubinger

"wolfc" wrote : You don't want to go into class loader details. The beanInterface name is used for comparisons. It's actually a view identifier and not a Java interface as such. Then how do you resolve: @Local | interface MyBusinessLocal extends MyCommon @EJB | MyCommon myBean; For this you need to load the class in order to get all superclasses as well. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195178#4195178 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195178

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Creatiing new pooled actors for every task instance

by stringaling

I have no issue with assignment at run time. In my mind the assignment is the join between the JBPM_POOLEDACTOR, and JBPM_TASKINSTANCE via the JBPM_TASKACTORPOOL. Where I have issue is creating assignee's (POOLEDACTOR) when there are defined as part of the process definition. The fact that I declare a swimlane that defines a pooled_actor such as: | <swimlane name="Fraud"> | <assignment pooled-actors="Fraud User"/> | </swimlane> | would be a pretty good indication that this not going to change. OK - I do understand that the list of pooled-actors can be determined at runtime via an expression, and in this case there is a need to store the actor at run times. But then why bother with the MANY-TO-MANY join then. Why not put the instance_id directly on the JBPM_POOLEDACTOR table. The same functionality could be achieved then with 2 joins instead of 3. Here is an example of the query: | <query name="TaskMgmtSession.findPooledTaskInstancesByActorId"> | <![CDATA[ | select distinct ti | from org.jbpm.taskmgmt.exe.PooledActor pooledActor | join pooledActor.taskInstances ti | where pooledActor.actorId = :swimlaneActorId | and ti.actorId is null | and ti.isSuspended != true | and ti.isOpen = true | ]]> | </query> | (from hibernate.queries.hbm.xml) What the query hides is the MANY-TO-MANY table that is part of the hibernate mapping definition: | ... | <set name="pooledActors" | cascade="all" | table="JBPM_TASKACTORPOOL"> | <key column="TASKINSTANCE_" foreign-key="FK_TASKACTPL_TSKI"/> | <many-to-many class="org.jbpm.taskmgmt.exe.PooledActor" column="POOLEDACTOR_" /> | ... | </set> | (from TaskInstance.hbm.xml) | <set name="taskInstances" inverse="true" table="JBPM_TASKACTORPOOL"> | <key column="POOLEDACTOR_" foreign-key="FK_TSKACTPOL_PLACT"/> | <many-to-many class="org.jbpm.taskmgmt.exe.TaskInstance" column="TASKINSTANCE_" /> | </set> | (from PooledActor.hbm.xml) The three joins is compounded by a 4th join that I need to do to properly implement paging within our application. :( View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195176#4195176 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195176

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2008