December 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: netty http integration update

by ataylor

Ive just checked in the latest netty http integration changes. for every request there is now a matching response and no responses are sent unsolicited. Ive added an acceptor config, (commented out), and a connector config and matching connection factory. Ive run the performance tests which gave reasonable results, about 30% slower on my machine. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195401#4195401 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195401

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Paging code review

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

My idea yesterday was to use the Header Size as the last chunk size on flow control, but in a second thought yes this is broken as I could have messages never arriving as the very first flow control was not confirmed. I'm fixing it. I will add a property on ClientMessage to store the next flowControl to be used. On regular message that will aways be the encodeSize, and on LargeMessages the size of the last chunk. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195389#4195389 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195389

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: StorageManager::storeDelete

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Ok, I will create a new method. I actually wanted to rename those storeDelete to just delete methods. When we implement a DatabasePersistenceManager (if we are going to implement one), we will actually just delete records. The fact we need to store something to do a delete, is just an implementation detail. So, I would add deleteLastPage and deleteMessage methods. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195385#4195385 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195385

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Unit test: stateful testRemove

by wolfc

Stateful21 contains (by inheritance) a remove method with the same signature as the EJBObject remove. I say we should throw an exception during deployment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195376#4195376 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195376

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-6297, mbean service optional injection

by alesj

OptionalDependencyItem is only there to wire together beans that actually existed - to be properly unwinded on undeploy. But I guess similar dependency item could be added from the beginning. You would only need to override unresolved() method, to only return true when the dependent bean exists. I just didn't introduce it, as it would always return true on isResolved() call. Where we actually only need it when dependency exists. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195372#4195372 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195372

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Unit test: stateless failure because of bridged method

by wolfc

Stateless contains 1 failure because a bridged method shows up in advisor.advisedMethods: anonymous wrote : [null, null, null, null, null, null, public volatile java.lang.Object org.jboss.ejb3.test.stateless.UnsecuredStatelessBean.testMandatoryTx(java.lang.Object) throws javax.transaction.SystemException, null, public int org.jboss.ejb3.test.stateless.UnsecuredStatelessBean.method(int) throws javax.naming.NamingException, null, null, null, null, null, null, public java.lang.String org.jboss.ejb3.test.stateless.UnsecuredStatelessBean.testMandatoryTx(java.lang.String) throws javax.transaction.SystemException, null, null, null, null, null, null, null] While the real method does have the annotation, the bridged method does not. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195367#4195367 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195367

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Meta data merging of beans using ejb-class

by wolfc

The patch itself brings regression in other forms. I'm chasing the snowball. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195364#4195364 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195364

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task Management component?

by kukeltje

Ehh.... Tom... facelets is related to JSF. It is about rendering components to something. HTML for webpages, but it could also be wap, xml, text or anything. And the way seam uses it for email is just rendering... not to a screen, but rendering never the less and therefor also done in the jsf rendering phase. So I'm e.g. not sure how using facelets for rendering an email would work if it is e.g. done for a reminder... Maybe some of the Seam guys could comment on this It is possible though to write JSF components in GWT by using e.g. http://unrealities.com/seamgwt. Still, we should first make clear what we want and when. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195362#4195362 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195362

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - GWT console reports

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

I just finished the first cut of the birt integration: https://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-13191 It's a thin layer atop of the BIRT report engine that allows access to reports through HTTP. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195360#4195360 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195360

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task Management component?

by kukeltje

Pure xsd's is to limited, e.g. no option to specify readonly or specify labels (unless e.g., using annotations) but there is a technology independent (rendering wise) form definition, xforms. There have been multiple posts on this. It is the rendering of these definitions and the actual usage (in the console, but also in user application imo). That could of course be done runtime in the console, but it is also about customizability. In all a very broad subject that me might start defining on a wiki page and discuss here. anonymous wrote : then we could easily build applications that interact with the task management by any means. JSF could then be one of them. | Well, yes and no... we could but to what extend are we going to support components for this that can be used by end-users? Or won't we? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195359#4195359 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195359

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2008