"PMN" wrote :
| By the way, I posted an example of a real concept of layout - layout being able to embed layout - Ajax dev kit have this now well defined, not only YUI.
|
| This really is layout and is needed.
Agreed but if i understand what you are saying, this is on top ot the presentation framework not a PF concern.
So you would have a YUI implementation of the PF that deals with the layout. And we will provide a layout mechanism for HTML.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131123#4131123
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131123
This is the second time I have been answered that it is possible without indicating the way to do it.
Please do ... I have done my best to read PortalNodeEventListener, WindowNavigationEvent and could not find any way of doing this there.
Same issue for changing region for a portlet, where, when?
By the way, I posted an example of a real concept of layout - layout being able to embed layout - Ajax dev kit have this now well defined, not only YUI.
This really is layout and is needed.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131116#4131116
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131116
Scott or any other guru
I have a .sar file, inside which is a .war file containing a servlet (FooServlet).
The .sar file has a jboss-service.xml:
<server>
| <mbean name="jboss.xts:service=XTSService" code="org.jboss.transactions.XTSService">
| <depends>jboss.web:service=WebServer</depends>
| </mbean>
| </server>
which is all well and good as far as it goes.
However, in addition to the above dependency, I want to ensure that XTSService does not start until FooServlet has been deployed by the web server. Does the server provide a way to express such a dependency? If so, how do I figure out the name of the FooServlet to use?
Thanks
Jonathan.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131111#4131111
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131111
I seemed to have editied my posting instead of posting a correction.
Here's the full correct post:
Something like:
| @JBossXmlSchema(elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.UNQUALIFIED)
| @XmlRootElement(name="aop");
| public class AOPDeployment extends AbstractKernelDeployment
| {
| }
|
Although I don't think Alex has put much testing into unqualified schemas in JBossXB
so you might want to force people to update their xml to use a namespace?
| @JBossXmlSchema(namespace="urn:jboss:aop:2.0", elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED)
| @XmlRootElement(name="aop");
| <aop xmlns="urn:jboss:aop:2.0">
| </aop>
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131100#4131100
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131100
"kabir.khan(a)jboss.com" wrote : FULL POST...
| Thanks, I will look into that. I think that answers a lot of the other questions I was about to ask.
|
| However, I also need to be able to have
|
| | <aop>
| | </aop>
| |
|
| at the top level so that I can support deployments similar to the current -aop.xml. Do you have any tips on how to achieve that?
|
|
Something like:
| @JBossXmlSchema(elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.UNQUALIFIED)
| public class AOPDeployment extends AbstractKernelDeployment
| {
| }
|
Although I don't think Alex has put much testing into unqualified schemas in JBossXB
so you might want to force people to update their xml to use a namespace?
| @JBossXmlSchema(namespace="urn:jboss:aop:2.0", elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED)
|
| <aop xmlns="urn:jboss:aop:2.0">
| </aop>
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131097#4131097
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131097