March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Splitting the rest of MC

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

JBVFS is closer to an mc project than labs in my view. But then, I have never paid attention to the jira top-level categories. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136424#4136424 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136424

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Snapshot vs. release repository

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

What's the benefit of having two repositories? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136420#4136420 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136420

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: @RunAs annotations on Servlet Classes

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I added a stub org.jboss.metadata.web.spec.AnnotationMergedView to metadata. I can't work on this right now so if you want to try be my guest. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136419#4136419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136419

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Shared Parent POM for dependencyManagement

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

org.jboss:jboss-parent is too general for that. A separate parent pom that is imported by jbossas and other projects looking to integrate into makes more sense. We still need to get a handle on whether there is an acceptable version range policy (only minor version, custom jboss policy, etc.). I would also suggest that snapshot version cannot be introduced into the common parent. It has to be done in the project. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136418#4136418 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136418

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBDEPLOY-3 issues

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136413#4136413 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136413

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM With Seam

by fady.matar

You might take a look at the Ldap component developed by the Seam guys, haven't looked much at the details yet, but it could be a good effort to reduce duplicate effort across multiple projects View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136411#4136411 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136411

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Generalizing dependency injection

by adrian＠jboss.org

"wolfc" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : What you are describing is called "flow control". You can do it outside an EJB | | with an aspect, e.g. a semaphore controlling access to a singleton. | | | | If the semaphore/pool uses priority queuing the admin request | | can "jump the queue" based on a higher privilege. | A pool beats a semaphored singleton anytime. Obviously wrong. ;-) It makes no difference whether the semaphore is on the pool or the object, and the rest of the code is the same. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136410#4136410 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136410

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Notion of 'compatible-version'?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Clearly the version resolution should be pluggable. The current behavior and issue to make this pluggable is: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-612 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136408#4136408 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136408

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - AbstractWARDeployer and unpacking jars

by adrian＠jboss.org

In AbstractWarDeployer there's some code that unpacks jars into the tmp directory. This looks to be some limitation related to Tomcat not using the VFS from the comment | /* Unpack wars to the tmp directory for now until tomcat can use the vfs directly. Since | * the vfs deals with the distinction between a true directory, the only way we can tell from | * this level of the api is to look for a url that ends in '/'. Here we assume that the name is | * the root url. | */ | If we're going to do this properly, then the tmp directory files should be replacing the VFS urls in the classpath of the deployment. However, I bet Tomcat has some abstraction that we can override to tell it to use the VFS to load static resources? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136407#4136407 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136407

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: @RunAs annotations on Servlet Classes

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I added a org.jboss.web.deployers.MergedJBossWebMetaDataDeployer to the server module. It needs the http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMETA-7 completed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136406#4136406 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136406

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008