March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Do you even read the JIRA issues assigned to you? :-) No, I have you to remind me of them. :-) - http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREFLECT-2 You did the issue moving just recently, and now you're showing off. :-) But yeah, I need to clean some of my JBREFLECT issues. Constantly putting them to the back of my mind. "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | No because the objects are shared unlike the normal reflection objects. So, even after this JBREFLECT-2 is done, it wont be possible to create that method on the spi interfaces? Or what would resolved JBREFLECT-2 issue do? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136333#4136333 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136333

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Shared Parent POM for dependencyManagement

by rrajesh

Would moving the common thirdparty dependencies to jboss-parent POM (org.jboss:jboss-parent) solve this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136329#4136329 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136329

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: ServletContainer.register(ServletContainerContext contex

by chris.laprun＠jboss.com

Not sure, will investigate more. However, looking at the test case for ServletContainer, it looked that the method was used quite a bit as well... so I figured it should be on the interface instead of the default implementation. I think I need a better understanding of the web module to give a definitive answer. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136328#4136328 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136328

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "alesj" wrote : | | I guess we wont be able to do it w/o Field.setAccessible(true)? | | | Should we introduce setAccessible(boolean) to FieldInfo, MethodInfo, ConstructorInfo? | No because the objects are shared unlike the normal reflection objects. This makes them more efficient in terms of memory and construction. That is one of the reasons why the reflect classes were created in the first place. anonymous wrote : Does Javassist have something equivalent? Do you even read the JIRA issues assigned to you? :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136327#4136327 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136327

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Notion of 'compatible-version'?

by wolfc

Until we know how Maven handles ranges during its release cycle we should not be using that. Suppose the following: AS 5.0 depends on EJB3 [1.0,2.0) Current EJB3 release is 1.0. Now I release EJB3 1.1. How reproducable is the AS 5.0 build? It should also be doing a release cycle itself (which can be as simple as a nightly build) to perform an acceptance test on EJB3 1.1. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136325#4136325 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136325

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | I guess we wont be able to do it w/o Field.setAccessible(true)? | Should we introduce setAccessible(boolean) to FieldInfo, MethodInfo, ConstructorInfo? Does Javassist have something equivalent? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136322#4136322 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136322

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5259, JMS Destination Names is showing as QueueServ

by mark.spritzler

Actually, I'll need to update from svn, but with the Hudson build failing, my chances of getting a local build is nill. Mark View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136320#4136320 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136320

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBDEPLOY-3 issues

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : The "type" is a notion used by the management layer for grouping, | it has no use in the deployers and is even probably difficult to | set effectively in some usecases. Drop it out of deployers then as well? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136314#4136314 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136314

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security Injection in AS5

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5312 DynamicLoginConfig provides dynamic installation of application policies (such as jbossmq). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136311#4136311 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136311

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Implementing JAXB style parsing for aop-mc-int

by adrian＠jboss.org

jboss-beans-common shouldn't have a namespace I've said that every time I've mentioned this schema :-( Anyway, I've reverted the xsd:redefine until the problem is fixed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136298#4136298 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136298

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008