March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5259, JMS Destination Names is showing as QueueServ

by mark.spritzler

OK, I'll download the latest Hudson build and see if that helps. I have #1178, which has your changes. I'll try 1189, since the past three builds have failed. I'll also see if I can build and run the testsuite on my machine here. I usually don't have much luck building, but that is just me. :) Thanks Mark View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136296#4136296 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136296

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Implementing JAXB style parsing for aop-mc-int

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

There is a bug in the DefaultSchemaResolver that I am going to fix. But there is another issue you are going to run into after that. I.e. redefine can only be used with schemas with the same targetNamespace or with no targetNamespace. So, in your example you'll get an error like org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: -1:-1 10:18 src-redefine.3.1: The targetNamespace of the referenced schema, currently 'urn:jboss:beans-common:2.0', must be identical to that of the redefining schema, currently 'urn:jboss:aop-beans:1.0'. | at org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.XsdBinderTerminatingErrorHandler.handleError(XsdBinderTerminatingErrorHandler.java:40) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.xs.XMLSchemaLoader.reportDOMFatalError(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.xs.XSLoaderImpl.loadURI(Unknown Source) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.Util.loadSchema(Util.java:367) PS: I saw you also tried the namespace as the schemaLocation, it should be the filename. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136295#4136295 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136295

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Notion of 'compatible-version'?

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : The http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html show a number of issues related to version ranges as being fixed. The question is, what happens when you use them? | You pray it works. We already know that our version strings are not interpreted correctly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136285#4136285 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136285

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Generalizing dependency injection

by adrian＠jboss.org

I thought EJB3 used its own thread local pooling to avoid contention? Personally I think object pooling is an anti-pattern unless the constructed object has some intensive construction steps. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136282#4136282 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136282

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBDEPLOY-3 issues

by adrian＠jboss.org

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | If type is not part of DeploymentUnit, then a ManagementDeployment annotation would have to be added to use with the ManagedObjects. | That's what we agreed before isn't it? The "type" is a notion used by the management layer for grouping, it has no use in the deployers and is even probably difficult to set effectively in some usecases. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136281#4136281 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136281

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Splitting the rest of MC

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | The VFS isn't really part of the MC. It was just developed there first | for convenience. | | The metadata repository, reflection, MetaType and Managed | really fall into the same category. No dependency on the core MC projects. | | But they are more obviously associated with the MC/Deployers project since they are their biggest consumers. Yup, but that's the same with VFS. Its only (current) other consumer is AS, and even that goes (strictly) through deployers. I see this category more as who's developing (where it came from) that than what it actually does. e.g. Labs category ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136279#4136279 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136279

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Splitting the rest of MC

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | I've created a Microcontainer category. | | | I guess JBVFS belongs there too. The VFS isn't really part of the MC. It was just developed there first for convenience. The metadata repository, reflection, MetaType and Managed really fall into the same category. No dependency on the core MC projects. But they are more obviously associated with the MC/Deployers project since they are their biggest consumers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136276#4136276 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136276

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Invalid jboss-deployers-vfs-spi POM

by adrian＠jboss.org

"ALRubinger" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : If you don't want to do the extra work of reading a forum where a project is being developed then don't use a snapshot. :-) | | That wasn't an option. I've got to use the same versions for EJB3 as the AS assembly will place in the runtime, else I'll have a version conflict. | AS isn't using the MC snapshot, it is using Beta10.1 If it were, it would be broken :-) anonymous wrote : | But after the changes to the build system, and the discussion on a forum you weren't monitoring, I'm guessing you now feel my pain. :) | | S, | ALR Not really, because I haven't integrated the latest MC into AS yet and when I do I'll give everybody fair warning before I do it. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136275#4136275 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136275

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection

by alesj

"kabir.khan(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | if (o instanceof org.jboss.aop.proxy.container.AspectManaged) | | { | | //It is a proxy | | } | | else if (o instanceof org.jboss.aop.Advised) | | { | | //It is woven | | } | | else | | { | | //Plain class | | } | | Do we need such a check? e.g. JoinpointFactory | // perhaps name param is too much | boolean isFieldAccesible(Object target, String name); | Where AOPJpF would do the above mentioned check, and BasicJpF just returned true. Since relying on ClassInfo.getDeclaredField to do the trick would mean that we would have to do it for the proxy's classinfo. And since usually EJBs have their fields private, but still want the injection. I guess we wont be able to do it w/o Field.setAccessible(true)? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136263#4136263 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136263

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection

by alesj

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-262 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4136258#4136258 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4136258

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008