March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 3.2.x issue tracking

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

Hi Scott, For the previous releases, this was almost entirely done by Tom. But he is a bit swamped in his PVM work at the moment. I will be looking into the next release as one of my upcoming tasks and I can use every bit of help available. It involves going over all the bugs (not the new features for a service release), looking if they are really bugs, validating them wether we will fix them or not or if they possibly have been fixed already, fixing them if necessary (according to their importance) and then releasing the new release. Simple huh ;-) Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135447#4135447 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135447

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Removing HSQLDB

by estaub

I'm with Bernd and Fady - jBPM4, in-memory, with isolation. As soon as anyone gets seriously into multithreaded use of JBPM, they get hosed by HSQL. Its current status "in the box" makes it seem like it's the "reference database" for JBPM, which it definitely shouldn't be. -Ed Staub View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135438#4135438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135438

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: how crucial are exception handlers ?

by estaub

Tom, Sorry, "rigorous" could be taken in so many ways... I should have been more ... um... rigorous ;-). I meant that it should be easy for someone to understand where the transaction edges are, without digging into the implementation of each delegation class. So part of this is a designer UI issue, but the engine has to behave in a way that the designer UI can predict. Someone modifying the process shouldn't need to exhaustively study the behavior of every component already in the process in order to understand where it will rollback to if an error occurs. [On the other hand, it's very reasonable to expect someone adding a node to understand its transaction semantics.] The engine can help with this by providing a means by which nodes (and transitions) can express their transaction behavior. Clearly there's lots of progress in PVM versus JPDL3. I'm not sure how much more is needed. I don't understand PVM very well... is it valid to have an Activity that is not an ExternalActivity, yet waits for an external event? I hope not - this would mean that the automatic transaction edges caused by wait states are denoted by the class inheritance. This is the kind of "rigor" I'm hoping for in the engine. If the designer UI has access to the activity class, it can introspect and provide visual cues. anonymous wrote : i don't want to be limited to the bonita behaviour that you describe I couldn't agree more. IMHO, this is a key differentiator for JPDL - the ability to efficiently do "microflows". anonymous wrote : we enhance the command based session facade that sits in front of the jbpm-context-blocks. in such a session facade, you could choose to have it operate synchronously or asynchronously. | Sorry, I don't follow - I don't know enough about where things have gotten beyond JBPM3. By "synchronously", do you mean "in the same transaction"? Thanks, -Ed Staub View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135435#4135435 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135435

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5259, JMS Destination Names is showing as QueueServ

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I added JmsDestinationUnitTestCase.testDLQ to query the queue for the existing DLQ and its not finding the component. Looking at why that is. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135432#4135432 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135432

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jBPM 3.2.x issue tracking

by rsdickerson

anonymous wrote : It would be *very* nice if someone could help out with the 3.2.x issues. As Ronald told help assess, prioritize and eventually implement them. Could you start a topic on the jbpm developer's forum for this? | | Regards, | Koen Koen, Could you outline how this process has been handled for previous releases? Thanks, Scott View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135428#4135428 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135428

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Splitting the rest of MC

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : I've created a Microcontainer category. | Any reason why JBMICROCONT isn't part of it? It is now :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135426#4135426 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135426

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: webservices ejb3 api usage

by wolfc

Don't forget WebServiceRef and WebServiceContext injection. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135423#4135423 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135423

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Splitting the rest of MC

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : I've created a Microcontainer category. Any reason why JBMICROCONT isn't part of it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135420#4135420 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135420

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: new OSGi project

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : In order not to confuse people now, what's the best way to 'deprecate' this project: | - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/osgi/ I'm just about to tag it and delete it. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135416#4135416 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135416

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Splitting the rest of MC

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : Perhaps putting a Category here: | - http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa | To get all the newly created JIRAs under same category/group - MC or something ... I've created a Microcontainer category. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135415#4135415 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135415

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008