March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Configurator and MethodJoinpoints replacement

by adrian＠jboss.org

No this goes back to the configurator tidyup task you just closed. These methods are no longer used except by the obsolete "OldConfigureAction". They should have been removed (and so should the obsolete action). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137487#4137487 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137487

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Moving to CR1 releases of the MC projects

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I am working on the aop-mc-int xml parsing. Am I OK to commit to aop-mc-int? It will be -updates to the tests, which are mostly broken anyway due to the xml parsing -updates to the org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata package, which is unused until the SingletonSchemaResolverFactory is switched over to use org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.AOPDeployment View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137482#4137482 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137482

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel module wip WARNING

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | The jboss-mdr snapshot you released yesterday depends on the old | jboss-reflect-2.0.0.Beta11 | MDR change was a small bug fix. If it helps, you can revert it. I know where to find it and fix it again. So, even though Reflection didn't have any impact on my MDR change, I should move this dependency to snapshot in MDR? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137481#4137481 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137481

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Implementing JAXB style parsing for aop-mc-int

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Cool, Now that the xsd:redefine issue has been resolved, this all seems to work a lot better! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137478#4137478 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137478

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel module wip WARNING

by adrian＠jboss.org

Its even worse than that. The jboss-mdr snapshot you released yesterday depends on the old jboss-reflect-2.0.0.Beta11 Looks like I going to be wasting most of this evening trying to fix poms again. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137475#4137475 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137475

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Configurator and MethodJoinpoints replacement

by alesj

Or I can use the PropertyInfo.getFieldInfo and use this API from JoinpointFactory: | FieldGetJoinpoint getFieldGetJoinpoint(FieldInfo fieldInfo) throws JoinpointException; | | FieldSetJoinpoint getFieldSetJoinpoint(FieldInfo fieldInfo) throws JoinpointException; | Again ugly, but effective. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137474#4137474 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137474

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel module wip WARNING

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | The purpose of "mvn install" is so you can install it in your local repository | | without having to publish unfinished work to everybody else until it is ready. | | | Sure, but once I commit something, and my stuff depends on a snapshot that is in my local repo, I guess you'll complain if this snapshot isn't also in the jboss repo? | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137468#4137468 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137468

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Configurator and MethodJoinpoints replacement

by alesj

I need a replacement for MethodJoinpoint in - Configurator::getPropertyGetterJoinPoint - Configurator::getPropertySetterJoinPoint since it requires getter/setter to create MethodJoinpoint, which we obviously don't have with the FieldsPropertyInfo. Something like PropertyJoinpoint? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137466#4137466 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137466

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel module wip WARNING

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | It's called 'have a little faith in the work of others'. :-) | "Faith can move mountains" but you have to careful about where you move them to. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137464#4137464 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137464

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[QA of JBoss Portal] - Re: portal fail over testing

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

As we just discussed over the phone, the *portlet* session replication needs to be automatically tested. More than the webapp session (since it's tested at the AS level already, it doesn't cost much to test as well though) Also it would be good to have as part of the automated testsuite, a way to test the whole Navigational state replication. (So that you don't have to do it manually anymore, we also need to revisit the manual testing part since it failed lately :-/ My bad for not reviewing the scenarios) Navigation State consists of: - Window State (Maximized, Minimized, Normal, ...) - Portlet Mode (View, Edit, Help...) - Render Parameters Basically if you change the mode, change a render parameter and modify the window state, it should replicate on the other nodes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137459#4137459 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137459

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008