March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMC 2.0.0.Beta11

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : "alesj" wrote : | | The method was changed long ago to take classloader as parameter. | | And I don't see what more we can do regarding classloader if one is not provided than what we already do. | | If they don't provide a classloader then that's their fault. ;-) :-) OK, I removed the FIXME and closed #25. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137215#4137215 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137215

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: New jBPM Console

by kukeltje

For the most part I agree with Britt, although the number of platforms the console could run on is *currently* limited then. That is where I (to some extend) agree with Jeff. The fact that the jbpm console does not need to run on the same system as the rest of the process or the esb to me is therefore no limitation. Internally we even forbid the console to run on the same system. But still I'd go for JPA with pojo's (although I like ejb3 better) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137214#4137214 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137214

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security aspects failing in AS trunk

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Cleaning out 3rdparty fixes that problem. I am still seeing some failures, but will see if I can figure out what is going on View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137213#4137213 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137213

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss IIOP on JBoss] - CORBA_BAD_INV_ORDER running AS 5 IIOP tests with JDK 6

by smcgowan＠redhat.com

There are some iiop test failures seen running the AS 5 testsuite with JDK 6 (hot topic these days). The exceptions occur during InputStream or OutputStream operations within the invoke() method in: ./iiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/DynamicIIOPStub.java The nested exception is org.omg.CORBA.BAD_INV_ORDER Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.BAD_INV_ORDER: vmcid: 0x0 minor code: 4 completed: No at org.jacorb.orb.ORB.work_pending(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.orb.Delegate.checkORB(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.orb.Delegate.invoke_internal(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.orb.Delegate.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl._invoke(ObjectImpl.java:457) at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.DynamicIIOPStub.invoke(DynamicIIOPStub.java:124) The class imports: import org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.InputStream; import org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.OutputStream; These classes are in jacorb.jar and in jre/lib/rt.jar of JDK 6 . Looking for suggestions on how to reconcile running in this configuration. Seems more than just a test config issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137209#4137209 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137209

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMC 2.0.0.Beta11

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | The method was changed long ago to take classloader as parameter. | And I don't see what more we can do regarding classloader if one is not provided than what we already do. If they don't provide a classloader then that's there fault. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137206#4137206 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137206

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMC 2.0.0.Beta11

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | JBMICROCONT-28 - BeanMetaData as ValueMetaData - this looks like an unimplemented edge case? | This is partially done. BeanMetaData does implement VMD. It's the cloning that's not done. "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | JBMICROCONT-25 - Configurator tidyup - like it says just tidyup | We can close this one, since I doubt it will ever get more tidy. As for this FIXME | // FIXME the isAssignable and isProgression currently needs a classloader | // to work properly, use the bean's classloader if there isn't one provided | if (cl == null) | cl = info.getClassInfo().getType().getClassLoader(); | The method was changed long ago to take classloader as parameter. And I don't see what more we can do regarding classloader if one is not provided than what we already do. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137204#4137204 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137204

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security aspects failing in AS trunk

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I'm trying again having got rid of all snapshots from thirdparty View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137203#4137203 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137203

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Security aspects failing in AS trunk

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

When running the org.jboss.test.aop.test.SecurityUnitTestCase testcase in AS trunk I get the following error: | <testcase classname="org.jboss.test.aop.test.SecurityUnitTestCase" name="testAnnotated" time="0.984"> | <error type="javax.management.RuntimeMBeanException">javax.management.RuntimeMBeanException | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.handleInvocationExceptions(ReflectedDispatcher.java:180) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:165) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:96) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88) | at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:668) | at org.jboss.jmx.connector.invoker.InvokerAdaptorService.invoke(InvokerAdaptorService.java:270) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:157) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:96) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:138) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:90) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:140) | at org.jboss.jmx.connector.invoker.SerializableInterceptor.invoke(SerializableInterceptor.java:74) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:90) | at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:668) | at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPProxyFactory.invoke(JRMPProxyFactory.java:179) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:157) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:96) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88) | at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:668) | at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker$MBeanServerAction.invoke(JRMPInvoker.java:815) | at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker.invoke(JRMPInvoker.java:416) | at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:294) | at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:153) | at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) | at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:149) | at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:466) | at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:707) | at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) | Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jboss.security.SubjectInfo.getAuthenticationPrincipal()Ljava/security/Principal; | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.SecurityTester.org$jboss$test$aop$bean$SecurityTester$testAnnotated$aop(SecurityTester.java:380) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.SecurityTester$SecurityTesterAdvisor.testAnnotated6887871432162944908(SecurityTester$SecurityTesterAdvisor.java) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.SecurityTester.testAnnotated(SecurityTester.java) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:157) | ... 41 more | Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jboss.security.SubjectInfo.getAuthenticationPrincipal()Ljava/security/Principal; | at org.jboss.security.plugins.JBossSecurityContextUtil.getUserPrincipal(JBossSecurityContextUtil.java:81) | at org.jboss.security.SecurityAssociation.getPrincipal(SecurityAssociation.java:200) | at org.jboss.aspects.security.SecurityActions$PrincipalInfoAction$2.getPrincipal(SecurityActions.java:163) | at org.jboss.aspects.security.SecurityActions.getPrincipal(SecurityActions.java:362) | at org.jboss.aspects.security.AuthenticationInterceptor.authenticate(AuthenticationInterceptor.java:108) | at org.jboss.aspects.security.AuthenticationInterceptor.invoke(AuthenticationInterceptor.java:66) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.JoinPoint_constructor_AnnotatedSecuredPOJO_0_291$aop.invokeNext(JoinPoint_constructor_AnnotatedSecuredPOJO_0_291$aop.java) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.JoinPoint_constructor_AnnotatedSecuredPOJO_0_291$aop.invokeJoinpoint(JoinPoint_constructor_AnnotatedSecuredPOJO_0_291$aop.java) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.AnnotatedSecuredPOJO$AnnotatedSecuredPOJOAdvisor.AnnotatedSecuredPOJOAdvisor_new_$aop(AnnotatedSecuredPOJO$AnnotatedSecuredPOJOAdvisor.java) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.AnnotatedSecuredPOJO.AnnotatedSecuredPOJO_new_$aop(AnnotatedSecuredPOJO.java) | at org.jboss.test.aop.bean.SecurityTester.org$jboss$test$aop$bean$SecurityTester$testAnnotated$aop(SecurityTester.java:240) | ... 48 more | </error> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137202#4137202 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137202

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMC 2.0.0.Beta11

by adrian＠jboss.org

Kabir, once JBoss MDR Beta12 is done later this week, we should look at getting jboss-aop to use it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137201#4137201 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137201

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JBoss Deployers 2.0.0.Beta11

by adrian＠jboss.org

There are no open issues for Beta11 I plan to do a Beta12 anyway for the deployers aways since there's still work to do in sorting out how the AS uses deployers. For now, I've left the 6 open issues assigned to CR1 but they'll likely move to a beta12 next week. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137200#4137200 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137200

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008