March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JBMCIROCONT-77 - KernelControllerContextAware

by adrian＠jboss.org

Isn't this complete? Nobody is assigned to this task? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137173#4137173 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137173

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field signature usage

by adrian＠jboss.org

Can you raise JIRA issues for these please, so I know when they are done and users know what changed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137170#4137170 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137170

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Broken object names in jacc

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Use the full name | DU.getName() ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137169#4137169 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137169

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: State of the integration of the latest MC into AS

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | This isn't ideal, but with Ales's latest change to add support for private | | field injection, despite my request NOT to do major changes until I'd updated the latest | | (split up) MC in to JBossAS | | http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=130461 | | I don't feel confident about putting the latest stuff in there. | | | | Reflection and MDR which is what Ales is changing are the only projects | | I'd done beta11 releases for, but they are obviously out-of-date now. ;-( | My changes don't affect the previous code, at least that's what the tests said. :-) | I don't care what the tests said. I've spent the best part of the last two weeks doing "releases" of the latest MC code fixing problems while I try to split it up and integrate the latest stuff into JBossAS and test it. All that work would now be out of the window because of this fundamental change which isn't tested enough for me for me to take at the moment. Let's get it to a proper state this week then we can do proper releases all the way through the MC dependencies. The alternative, is to revert the changes in the kernel project so I can do a proper MC release off what I've tested (using beta11 of reflection/mdr). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137166#4137166 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137166

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: LDAP assignment handler

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

@Ronald How is replacing the IdentityService useful? The IdentityService is used by the IdentityLoginModule to authenticate users. Conversely, the ExpressionAssignmentHandler invokes ExpressionSession to resolve group memberships. The responsibilities of IdentityService and ExpressionSession overlap to such degree that IdentitySession implements both. For some reason, they currently are separate interfaces. I believe ExpressionSession should be merged into IdentityService and the latter turned into a context service (i. e. a subinterface of org.jbpm.svc.Service) configurable in jbpm.cfg.xml. The reason to subclass ExpressionAssignmentHandler is that it explicitly instantiates IdentitySession in method getExpressionSession(). No other changes were introduced. If ExpressionSession was merged into IdentityService and the latter was an actual context service, then no subclassing would be needed. Is this the kind of cleanup you did? @Tom The facade between the ExpressionAssignmentHandler and the identity component already exists, it is the ExpressionSession. However, one cannot specify a different implementation of the session without subclassing the handler. We need to address this, as well as the overlap with IdentityService. Relationship navigation could also be implemented by returning hand-made proxies just like those generated by Hibernate. However, the navigation requirements imposed on implementors would be made implicit instead of stated explicitly as methods in the facade. I believe explicit is better. Identity components that cannot be exposed as our model are out of scope, but they can always use the existing model as a starting point. Earlier I proposed merging ExpressionSession into IdentityService. On a second thought, the separation between the interfaces also corresponds to the separate requirements of each client of the identity service. Identity implementors could choose to implement only those interfaces that correspond to the features in use. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137162#4137162 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137162

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Broken object names in jacc

by adrian＠jboss.org

"anil.saldhana(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | If deploymentunit.getSimpleName is blank, then id= is blank. What makes you think the simple name is unique? It isn't. e.g. you could have multiple deploy directories with a test.war or you could have the same deployment name in "deploy" and "deployers" Use the full name View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137161#4137161 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137161

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Broken object names in jacc

by adrian＠jboss.org

org.jboss.test.web.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCase View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137160#4137160 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137160

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Moving to CR1 releases of the MC projects

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I'd prefer it you said Wednesday. But I want to get those changes tested in the AS before I do the other releases. | OK, I think we can agree on the Wednesday evening. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137159#4137159 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137159

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: State of the integration of the latest MC into AS

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | This isn't ideal, but with Ales's latest change to add support for private | field injection, despite my request NOT to do major changes until I'd updated the latest | (split up) MC in to JBossAS | http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=130461 | I don't feel confident about putting the latest stuff in there. | | Reflection and MDR which is what Ales is changing are the only projects | I'd done beta11 releases for, but they are obviously out-of-date now. ;-( My changes don't affect the previous code, at least that's what the tests said. :-) And it can also be a proof by design, since the only way you're gonna use the new changes is by triggering them using the new changes/additions to the API. And the changes in the Reflection have just one 'entry point', and that's the BeanAccessMode enum. The MDR changes are bug fixes. Which should be there anyway. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137158#4137158 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137158

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Moving to CR1 releases of the MC projects

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | e.g. I'd like to get the reflection and MDR projects with the latest "private fields" changes/fixes beta12 out as soon as possible since the other projects depend on those. | | | I'm currently hacking in the field injection features in the Kernel module. | ATM I don't see any other fixes/addition to Reflection or MDR, but I'm not done yet, specially not with the full blown tests. | But I promise I'll be done by Thursday. With all 3 modules. I'd prefer it you said Wednesday. But I want to get those changes tested in the AS before I do the other releases. They are core to the other dependencies which is why I want those projects at CR1 ASAP. reflection/mdr -> microcontainer reflection -> jbossxb mdr -> aop microcontainer -> classloaders microcontainer -> deployers View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137157#4137157 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137157

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008