April 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JBPAPP-750 - Integration between AS and JBossMessaging 1

by jesper.pedersen

Thank you for your feedback, Adrian ! I'll update the testsuite with the solution you describe. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142365#4142365 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142365

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JBPAPP-750 - Integration between AS and JBossMessaging 1

by adrian＠jboss.org

"jesper.pedersen" wrote : I'm currently looking at | | http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPAPP-750 | | with the integration between the EAP and JBossMessaging since JBM implements both the non-XA and XA interfaces. XA mode is selected at session level. | | 1) | Is the best way to handle this to extend the JmsConnectionRequestInfo class | with XA information - f.ex. UseXA - and then use this information when | creating the sessions in JmsManagedConnection::setup() ? | | Of course there will be other changes also JmsMCFProperties, ... Creating | f.ex. a JmsXASession class may be an idea. | No. XA or local is a property of the connection factory deployment not the request. anonymous wrote : | 2) | JmsActivation also need information about XA from JmsActivationSpec in order to create the correct connection type - so UseXA here. | | Any feedback on how this should be done is most welcome If you can't determine the type from the real ConnectionFactory then there's no portable way for you to determine what type of jca deployment you are in. The current jms resource adapter assumes the connection factory in the jms provider is consistent with the connection manager choice. This is just a testsuite issue (the idea is to test local only jms connection usage). A simple fix (in the testsuite) would be to create a wrapper connection factory that * only implements the non xa interfaces * delegates to the real connection factory * bind it into jndi with a different name * create a LocalJMSProvider using that wrapper for the test View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142352#4142352 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142352

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS 2.1 embedded?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

The SPI 3.0 will bring embedded functionality View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142348#4142348 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142348

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Anonymous beans

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : No. Just make MetaDataVisitorNode implement Cloneable. How does that help me with cloning the items? Since the item::clone() method comes from Object, where it is protected. e.g. | public AbstractCollectionMetaData clone() | { | AbstractCollectionMetaData clone = (AbstractCollectionMetaData)super.clone(); | clone.collection = getDefaultInstance(); | for (MetaDataVisitorNode item : collection) | clone.collection.add((MetaDataVisitorNode)item.clone()); | return clone; | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142345#4142345 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142345

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security Injection in AS5

by adrian＠jboss.org

I've closed JBDEPLOY-32. * Even if I hacked the deployers such that some parsing deployers ran before/after the construction of the classloader (assuming I know which those should be - which I don't) * I hacked those parsing deployers that ran after the classloader deployer to run with deployment classloader * We fixed JBossXB to support it Its simply not correct. You should NOT be mixing runtime and metadata models in this way. There are many reasons why you should not mix. The most obvious is programmatic deployment where I don't want to include random implementation jars in a client just to create some metadata to deploy a security domain. Seperate the deployment model from the runtime and place it in deployers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142344#4142344 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142344

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - JBPAPP-750 - Integration between AS and JBossMessaging 1.4

by jesper.pedersen

I'm currently looking at http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPAPP-750 with the integration between the EAP and JBossMessaging since JBM implements both the non-XA and XA interfaces. XA mode is selected at session level. 1) Is the best way to handle this to extend the JmsConnectionRequestInfo class with XA information - f.ex. UseXA - and then use this information when creating the sessions in JmsManagedConnection::setup() ? Of course there will be other changes also JmsMCFProperties, ... Creating f.ex. a JmsXASession class may be an idea. 2) JmsActivation also need information about XA from JmsActivationSpec in order to create the correct connection type - so UseXA here. Any feedback on how this should be done is most welcome View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142342#4142342 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142342

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - JBDEPLOY-32, how to deal with custom schemas with class bind

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

This usage of a custom schema binding in an mc bean property: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142337 is essentially the same as annotation processing. We need the deployment class loader to be able to create the binding classes. Right now there is no notion of parsing having to interact with a deployment class loader. Essentially the parsing of the bean property fragment needs to be delayed until the deployment class loader is available. The question is how to do this. Have jbossxb throw a unresolvable schema classes error that results in a partial KernelDeployment/BeanMetaData, or just have the value passed in the for bean property be an unresolved binding metadata value that has to be resolved after the class loader is established. Of course if the class loader setting itself has the unresolved value its a broken deployment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142340#4142340 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142340

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Anonymous beans

by adrian＠jboss.org

No. Just make MetaDataVisitorNode implement Cloneable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142338#4142338 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142338

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security Injection in AS5

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Ok, so you should not have to set the class loader on the deployment because this will have one that has access to the server classes, but the problem here is that the custom schema for the wildcard bindng of the policyConfig property value is essentially annotation processing, not simple xml parsing or binding to classes that are part of the deployers known types. In general these classes can be part of the deployment which requires establishment of the deployment class loader. This problem is covered by this issue: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBDEPLOY-32 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142337#4142337 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142337

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Anonymous beans

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | And I guess I would also have to iterate over all the collection items that are not immutable and clone them before adding them to new collection instance. | I need MetaDataVisitorNode to extend JBossInterface in order to clone AbstractCollectionMetaData and AbstractMapMetaData: | public class AbstractCollectionMetaData extends AbstractTypeMetaData | implements Collection<MetaDataVisitorNode>, Serializable | { | private static final long serialVersionUID = 2L; | | /** The collection */ | protected List<MetaDataVisitorNode> collection = new ArrayList<MetaDataVisitorNode>(); | | ... | | public class AbstractMapMetaData extends AbstractTypeMetaData | implements Map<MetaDataVisitorNode, MetaDataVisitorNode>, Serializable | { | private static final long serialVersionUID = 2L; | | /** The map */ | private Map<MetaDataVisitorNode, MetaDataVisitorNode> map = new HashMap<MetaDataVisitorNode, MetaDataVisitorNode>(); | So that I can iterate over the items and call item::clone(). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4142331#4142331 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4142331

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2008