April 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: jbossxb 1.0.0.SP2

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Ignore the -brew ones, they are practically the same. We should be moving away from them for the community project, if there is an equivalent non-brew version. Maybe use the latest slide/web-dav in XB ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141284#4141284 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141284

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: jbossxb 1.0.0.SP2

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

I guess, the difference in "-brew" suffix is not significant? There are a few. Is brew supposed to be used only for EAP? If so, then should I remove any XB dependency that include "-brew"-suffixed dependency? The only real difference in apache-slide/webdavlib which is 2.0 in XB and 2.1 in the AS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141278#4141278 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141278

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Build POM Versions

by wolfc

They should all be on build 0.13.0. I've removed any SNAPSHOT and circular dependency from build/pom.xml, so I could actually release some components. As we already knew, the actual problem lies in ejb3-core, so that one still contains snaps and circles. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141277#4141277 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141277

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBossXB pom

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Would it be used if it did? Would it make more sense to add xml-apis dependency to xercesImpl instead? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141271#4141271 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141271

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Maven release artifacts

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : If maven will oppose so many problem it will render itself useless anyway. Yes, let's let it to stay the test of time ;) "heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : I am looking for a smart way to hook into that without having to migrate our build completely. I agree. We have to deal with the integration issue. I would do it in the way we do it now in our spy, just release it to local maven repository and force developer to commit it there manually ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141258#4141258 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141258

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - JBossXB pom

by dimitris＠jboss.org

I'm looking at the jbossxb pom (in trunk). It declares a dependency on: | <dependency> | <groupId>apache-xerces</groupId> | <artifactId>xercesImpl</artifactId> | <version>2.9.1</version> | <scope>compile</scope> | </dependency> | Shouldn't it declare a dependency on the version of xml-apis that goes with the xerces impl? i.e. | <dependency> | <groupId>apache-xerces</groupId> | <artifactId>xml-apis</artifactId> | <version>2.9.1</version> | <scope>compile</scope> | </dependency> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141255#4141255 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141255

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Maven release artifacts

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

If maven will oppose so many problem it will render itself useless anyway. But until then we have to face it: AS has chosen to use maven and we need to deal with integration. Which basically means leveraging the maven repositories. I am looking for a smart way to hook into that without having to migrate our build completely. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141252#4141252 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141252

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: jbossxb 1.0.0.SP2

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Just compare the versions with those appearing here: https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/branches/Branch_4_2/build/build-third... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141251#4141251 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141251

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Maven release artifacts

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : This leads to the question if we want to migrate the build to maven or simply add maven release capabilities to it, which is probably easier but may cause issue in the long run, when more and more project migrate. Maybe there is a partly solution? Like brining in Ivy for dependency management? Basically I see the only benefit I see is leveraging maven repositories. We need to be able to publish to and retrieve from a maven repository. I'm not a Maven fan and I don't believe in Maven + AS future, see: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141238#4141238 So I'm saying don't migrate to maven builds instead of ant builds. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141249#4141249 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141249

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: jboss metadata pom

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

But maybe this is just another academic discussion? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141248#4141248 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141248

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2008