Do we really need ADD_MESSAGE on JournalStorageManager?
ADD_MESSAGE are aways done on Journal.appendAddRecord or appendAddRecordTransactional. With that in hand when you have an ADD on the journal it can't be other thing but ADD_MESSAGE.
I'm asking that because we are making an extra copy just to place the ADD_MESSAGE byte. We could eliminate it if we didn't need that.
I would of course keep the bytes on ACKs and MessageCounter.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149514#4149514
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149514
"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : So what happens when there is a getLocal() and BusinessLocal interfaces?
Should be as follows by default:
* /local > Proxy implementing all Local Business Interfaces
* /remote > Proxy implementing all Remote Business Interfaces
The only way to obtain a EJB 2.1 local or remote view is via its corresponding "Home.create()", so we won't bind these in JNDI directly.
Since /local and /remote above are non-deterministic in terms of "getInvokedBusinessInterface()", we'll provide mechanisms for additional lookup values that will be interface-specific.
Will make a new topic today to discuss my propositions for what objects (References, Proxies, ObjectFactories) get bound where in order to achieve this.
S,
ALR
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149512#4149512
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149512