May 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Snapshots update (mvn -U)

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Snapshots update (mvn -U)

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Here's an example of jboss-ejb3-core: cd thirdparty mvn -X -U package | [INFO] snapshot org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3-core:0.1.0-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from snapshots.jboss.org | [DEBUG] Skipping disabled repository central | [DEBUG] jboss-ejb3-core: resolved to version 0.1.0-20080507.084835-60 from repository snapshots.jboss.org | But here's the most recent snapshot: (http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/ejb3/jboss-ejb3-core/0.1.0-SN...) | jboss-ejb3-core-0.1.0-20080506.155037-61.jar | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149430#4149430 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149430

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by timfox

Andy and I were just discussing on IRC how, the user (for alpha) should be able to download the distro, unzip, and type ant and it should work, no config necessary. Can we include libaio in the distro? If so, then we can programmatically set the java lib path and no conf is necessary? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149423#4149423 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149423

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JCA login modules moved out of connector module

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Never mind. Jeff Zhang located the code where the injection of the security-domain element was not happening in http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5023 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149422#4149422 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149422

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by timfox

Ok, I worked out what is happening: AIO is picked up successfully when running tests on the command line, but is not picked up when running tests in eclipse. Probably because java.lib path is not set. Can we avoid this dependency on java lib path? I don't really like the idea of users having to set env properties to get our software to run. It's messy IMHO. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149416#4149416 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149416

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by ataylor

in fact i'll add a chapter something like "using asynchio for fast reliable performance" (or something, where we can inform the user of the how, why etc etc View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149410#4149410 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149410

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : You also need libaio: | | on the U word OS | aptitude install libaio | or | | On Fedora | yum libaio I'll add a chapter to the new user doc about this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149407#4149407 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149407

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : | When running the perf examples i get no difference in performance between nio and asyncio, Also bear in mind, that when running with just one producer/consumer you probably won't see any difference. aio comes into its own when there are multiple concurrent producers/consumers. NIO doesn't scale like that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149406#4149406 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149406

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" You also need libaio: on the U word OS aptitude install libaio or On Fedora yum libaio [/quote wrote : | | Well... you're libaio tests (apart from those known two) pass for me, so I must have libaio installed already. | | It's just when I start a server it doesn't recognise this and uses NIO instead. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149405#4149405 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149405

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"ataylor" wrote : anonymous wrote : Shouldn't this be picked up automatically? What am I missing here? | | thats what i assumed, am i right in thinking that the only libs that we need are either libJBMLibAIO32.so or libJBMLibAIO64.so or is there something else that needs installing? | | Ive updated the standalone distro to ship with these libs so should get used out of the box. | | When running the perf examples i get no difference in performance between nio and asyncio, in fact when i set journal-sync to false nio is faster. What should i expect? On the tests I have done... AIO would be a little bit faster than non Sync (when calling the Storage classes directly), but the same tests also shows the transport is maxing the numbers. (so.. at this point it should be the same) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149403#4149403 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149403

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2008