July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by wolfc

I consider http://wiki.jboss.org/auth/wiki/DevJNDIBinding to be authoritative on resulting JNDI names. The policy is just another means to get these results. If we want to change or expand these, that should be done first. The only thing that differs from Glassfish is how we handle a bean with 1 home interface. That's why we have the (unsupported) option to disable JBMETA-11 checking. In future I want to go to a mapped name which can contain expressions: @Stateless(mappedName="java:global/env/$s:optional(${appName}/)${moduleName}/${beanName}#${interface}") Which we should be able to realize with another policy implementation and then it should be EJB 3.1 compliant. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164384#4164384 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164384

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"ALRubinger" wrote : "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I think it should be the base jndi name, the equivalent of the jboss.xml jndi-name. | | jboss.xml jndi-name isn't a base..? | Its the remote home for ejb2, not sure what it has been used as for ejb3. "ALRubinger" wrote : | If the mappedName is a base name, then we can't bind anything directly to it. It'd be misleading for a bean provider to say "mappedName=MyBean" and then have to access "MyBean/remote". So mappedName should be similar to our @RemoteBinding handling, no? | | Carlo and I discussed this earlier, where mapped-name/jndi-name directly specify remote business binding, and all others use the default base. So given "mapped-name=MyBean" and a BasicJndiBindingPolicy: | | Default Remote Business Interface: "MyBean" | Remote Home: "ear/jar/ejb-name/home" | Remote Specific Business Interface: "ear/jar/ejb-name/remote-interfaceName" | In my view its similarly strange that there is no relationship to the other bindings. I see the issue with using a simple mappedName like MyBean not allowing uses like both MyBean and MyBean/home. I took a look at the glashfish ejb faq: https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/ejb/EJB_FAQ.html and it seems they have adopted a similar usage to have mappedName be the remote business interface, or at the level of xml its just the same as jndi-name for the reference global binding. So, remote business interface(s) proxy global jndi name it is. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164369#4164369 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164369

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by ALRubinger

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Have we stated a concise summary of every binding that can result given? I don't believe so, though once finalized we should update the Wiki at: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/DevJNDIBinding "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : - only a mappedName/jndi-name (these should be equivalent) mapped-name/jndi-name assigned to default remote business interface. All others to fall back on Default JNDI Binding Policy (which is required, if not specified at the EAR/JAR/EJB level then we default to BasicJndiBindingPolicy) "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : - only the default jndi binding policy Policy responsible for generation of all JNDI targets. "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : - both a mappedName and jndi binding policy mapped-name/jndi-name overrides default remote business interface only. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164361#4164361 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164361

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by ALRubinger

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I think it should be the base jndi name, the equivalent of the jboss.xml jndi-name. jboss.xml jndi-name isn't a base..? If the mappedName is a base name, then we can't bind anything directly to it. It'd be misleading for a bean provider to say "mappedName=MyBean" and then have to access "MyBean/remote". So mappedName should be similar to our @RemoteBinding handling, no? Carlo and I discussed this earlier, where mapped-name/jndi-name directly specify remote business binding, and all others use the default base. So given "mapped-name=MyBean" and a BasicJndiBindingPolicy: Default Remote Business Interface: "MyBean" Remote Home: "ear/jar/ejb-name/home" Remote Specific Business Interface: "ear/jar/ejb-name/remote-interfaceName" S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164360#4164360 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164360

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Have we stated a concise summary of every binding that can result given? - only a mappedName/jndi-name (these should be equivalent) - only the default jndi binding policy - both a mappedName and jndi binding policy View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164359#4164359 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164359

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I think it should be the base jndi name, the equivalent of the jboss.xml jndi-name. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164357#4164357 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164357

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Profiler running, no data captured

by jtrichar

Addendum: I have tested several permutations of the instructions here: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=133963 and they did not resolve the issue. So, repository=yes, core=asm or core=javassist, asm.jar (and/or javassist.jar) in $JBOSS_HOME/bin, no warnings in the log files. I'm not even seeing the class entries like the previous poster. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164303#4164303 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164303

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Profiler running, no data captured

by jtrichar

Hi folks, I'm trying to profile two WAR apps, one Seam and one Spring, with the v2 profiler. The profiler has been installed and is running (I can access the Controller MBean in the web-console), but when I look at the snapshots there's nothing recorded in the reports. Installation was almost exactly according to README.txt except that I had to put jboss-profiler.jar in $JBOSS_HOME/server/all/lib to correct a class not found exception on org.jboss.profiler.shared.Command. Environment is OSX 10.4; JB 4.2.2.GA; java 1.5.0_13. jboss-profiler.properties has the following set for include/exclude: includes=edu.*|private,org.alfresco.*|private | excludes=org.jboss.* and I'm running as: java -jar jboss-profiler-client.jar startProfiler | (run through web app in browser) | java -jar jboss-profiler-client.jar stopProfiler | java -jar jboss-profiler-client.jar getSnapshot 1 (or 2, or 3...) The output directory is created, but the report .txt files are just stubs: cat 20080714133618745-20080714133702906/overview.txt | From: 14 July 2008 13:36:18:745 | To : 14 July 2008 13:37:02:906 | | Threads: | ======== | | Most time: | ========== | Count Ms % Method | | Hotspots: | ========= | Count Ms Avg % Method | | | Classes: | ======== I've tried changing the includes/excludes values to be more or less precise (anything from just "*" to a fully-qualified class name), but no effect. I can't think what else might be going on to prevent the data capture. Any pointers would be very welcome. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164301#4164301 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164301

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] EJB mappedName as a Base?

by ALRubinger

Commits in r75783 to use mapped-name only for default remote business interface, and not use it as a base upon which to build. Updated the failing (incorrect) test cases as well. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164277#4164277 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164277

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jBPM 4: Identity and Task projects

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Identity and task have become projects on their own. The jpm4 subversion module now contains three distinct projects: * Identity * JPDL * Task View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164245#4164245 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164245

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008