You're right, I should have seen that coming :) I've gotten a bit sidetracked though, it wasn't the solution that I had an issue with, it was the idea that this was marked fixed as of 5.0.0.CR1 and it's really not. Seems more to me like something that won't be fixed, but can be worked around if you use facelets 1.1.15.B1 and if that was documented better people like me who run across the problem won't suffer as big of a headache from it. Hopefully this post will help with that.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176215#4176215
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176215
"alesj" wrote :
| What should be a proper/good fix for this?
|
| We have bunch of filters we could use.
| We need to allow only visibility of plain resource files from ear's root,
| e.g. some old .properties or legacy .xml,
| but definitely not directories.
The only reasonable filter is to exclude the "lib" child contents as that is the default ear lib directory name. If someone has a custom ear libx child, but excludes the directory via metadata, then would also have to disable the include root option as well.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176214#4176214
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176214
As much logging as possible would help.
IIRC some of those app server tests are very bad at clearing up their state. Perhaps a previous test has left behind a consumer after not closing its connection properly, and that consumer has nabbed the message instead of the one you expect. (I've seen this kind of thing before)
The server will eventually time out and close unclosed sessions, but if the next test kicks in before this occurs you might end up with these kind of issues.
Just a thought.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176199#4176199
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176199