September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by kukeltje

Hahaha... it can indeed be that simple but...In the anouncement when 3.3 comes out, I'd put a little more focus on this.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176240#4176240 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176240

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by kukeltje

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : "koen" wrote : we could also do org.jbpm.3 and org.jbpm.4 Yuck.... -1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176239#4176239 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176239

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Facelets scanning for .taglib.xml is broken in trunk

by iradix

You're right, I should have seen that coming :) I've gotten a bit sidetracked though, it wasn't the solution that I had an issue with, it was the idea that this was marked fixed as of 5.0.0.CR1 and it's really not. Seems more to me like something that won't be fixed, but can be worked around if you use facelets 1.1.15.B1 and if that was documented better people like me who run across the problem won't suffer as big of a headache from it. Hopefully this post will help with that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176215#4176215 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176215

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5895; Processing too many classes

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | What should be a proper/good fix for this? | | We have bunch of filters we could use. | We need to allow only visibility of plain resource files from ear's root, | e.g. some old .properties or legacy .xml, | but definitely not directories. The only reasonable filter is to exclude the "lib" child contents as that is the default ear lib directory name. If someone has a custom ear libx child, but excludes the directory via metadata, then would also have to disable the include root option as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176214#4176214 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176214

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Facelets scanning for .taglib.xml is broken in trunk

by alesj

"iradix" wrote : it just seems like there is a better solution than "use this version of the library". Which is? If you know it, post it here. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176203#4176203 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176203

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Sporadic read timeouts for app client reading a msg sent

by timfox

As much logging as possible would help. IIRC some of those app server tests are very bad at clearing up their state. Perhaps a previous test has left behind a consumer after not closing its connection properly, and that consumer has nabbed the message instead of the one you expect. (I've seen this kind of thing before) The server will eventually time out and close unclosed sessions, but if the next test kicks in before this occurs you might end up with these kind of issues. Just a thought. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176199#4176199 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176199

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Sporadic read timeouts for app client reading a msg sent

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The test is using a 60 second timeout, so there should not be an issue there. When the test runs the msg is obtained in millisecond timing, so 60 sec should be infinite. What is the best way to determine exactly why a msg is not recieved, client or server side trace logging? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176193#4176193 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176193

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : Another option is to enable multiple last resource enlistment in the transaction service. This is in fact not an option ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176190#4176190 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176190

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Failover on Shutdown

by jhowell＠redhat.com

Here's the jira task that actaully implements the feature request. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-1230 Note that is this only out for 1.4.0 sp3 cp02 and 1.4.1. Jay:) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176150#4176150 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176150

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Facelets scanning for .taglib.xml is broken in trunk

by iradix

I take back that part about the status being changed. I was looking at another bug. The rest of the statement applies however. When JBoss 5 goes GA and people who aren't using seam or aren't using the facelets jar from the seam lib folder can't deploy their apps..... it just seems like there is a better solution than "use this version of the library". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176141#4176141 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176141

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008