September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: Using customized RMI socket factory with JBOSSSerializat

by yaishb

By the way, the application is running with Java6.0. Another question, is there a way to contact directly with the developer or maintainer of this project? 10x, Barak. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176060#4176060 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176060

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

to prevent endless discussions on this detail, we'll collect opinions on the forum and thomas will decide on monday (as long as it starts with org.jbpm) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176054#4176054 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176054

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"koen" wrote : we could also do org.jbpm.3 and org.jbpm.4 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176053#4176053 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176053

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"thomas" wrote : I don't think it is a good idea to mix jbpm3 artefacts with jbpm4 artefacts in the same group +1 so if we have some distinction between the jbpm 3 and jbpm 4 artifacts, that would be good View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176052#4176052 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176052

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

thomas pointed out that org.jbpm already exists. also we can have the two codebases (3 and 4) generate artifacts in the same group/artifact. e.g. the jbpm-jpdl releases in version 4 can just end up in this list : http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/org/jbpm/jbpm-jpdl/ so i changed my opinion that it's better to go for org.jbpm instead of going for just jbpm View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176051#4176051 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176051

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

+1 for jbpm as opposed to org.jbpm if there is no convention or other that pushes us towards the use of domain names. Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176049#4176049 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176049

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

org.jboss.jbpm is a not good for me. i see two options for the group id: jbpm or org.jbpm my preference goes out to the shorter jbpm as there is no convention to use domain names for group id. but i'll go with the majority for this. in the meantime, i am convinced that it is better to put all the modules and artifacts for both jBPM 3 and jBPM 4 into a single group. if you disagree, please respond quickly or forever hold your silence as we need a decision soon. the jBPM 3.3.0 is about to be released. monday the latest we will decide on this. please add your vote here to use jbpm or org.jbpm. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176044#4176044 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176044

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Sticking to [url]http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/org/jbpm/ has the advantage of not creating even more entropy on the jboss maven repo. We could also have * org.jbpm.jbpm3 * org.jbpm.jbpm4 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176042#4176042 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176042

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Facelets scanning for .taglib.xml is broken in trunk

by alesj

Are you sure you're using the right (patched) Facelets jar? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176040#4176040 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176040

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: PostgeSQL runs take too long

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Down to 9 minutes from over 2 hours? Cool! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176039#4176039 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176039

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008