September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: PostgeSQL runs take too long

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

I'd say we take the opposite approach and clear those lines and reinsert where actually needed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175924#4175924 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175924

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5895; Processing too many classes

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Right, I believe this is what is happening. Classes end up not being found from the lib directory because the package name is wrong, but there should not be any root content in the classpath of the ear if the lib dir is empty as opposed to null. We need to check for an empty lib and skip it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175911#4175911 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175911

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - assign id to components in WSRP admin ui

by prabhat.jha＠jboss.com

Chris, Please see https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-2103 for detail. Basically, without consistent id for UI components and row identifier, we will have to do complex XPath queries to verify some assertions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175903#4175903 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175903

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: PostgeSQL runs take too long

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

It ain't configuration, it is the AbstractDbTestCase code: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm3/trunk/modules/core/src/main/jav... public void setUp() throws Exception { | createSchema(); // HERE | createJbpmContext(); | initializeMembers(); | } | | public void tearDown() throws Exception { | resetMembers(); | closeJbpmContext(); | dropSchema(); // AND HERE | super.tearDown(); | } Note however that removing the above lines will be a challenge because many tests depend on an empty database. Perhaps we could simply clear the tables instead of dropping them? Of course that would imply caring about constraint violations. Not an easy way out either. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175887#4175887 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175887

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJB3 Classloader Leak (EJBTHREE-1442)

by wolfc

The proxy ends up in the ejb3-connectors class loader, which is wrong. This happens for every remote invocation. This shows why: Heap walker - Allocations | Session: JBoss 5.x on localhost | Time of export: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:14:46 PM CEST | JVM time: 83:33 | | Current object set: 1 instance of java.lang.Class | Selection steps: 4 selection steps, 16 bytes shallow size | | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.run | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.dorun | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.processInvocation | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.completeInvocation | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker.invoke | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.aspects.remoting.AOPRemotingInvocationHandler.invoke | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.aop.Dispatcher.invoke | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.factory.session.SessionProxyFactoryBase.createProxyBusiness | 0.0% - 0 bytes - 0 alloc. org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.factory.ProxyFactoryBase.createProxyConstructor | 100.0% - 16 bytes - 1 alloc. java.lang.Class.getConstructor The proxy should have ended up in the same class loader as the business interface. That's the job of the ObjectFactory. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175879#4175879 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175879

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: Handling soft versus hard pooledInvoker exceptions in JR

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

"ScottMarlowNovell" wrote : ... but the app servers launched from the clustered unit test don't see each other. How are you launching them the AS instances from the clustered unit test? DId you check one-cluster-test target in testsuite? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175878#4175878 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175878

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Wild Card routing and security

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : I'm referring to the following code: | | if (checkAllowable) | | { | | if (!destinations.contains(address)) | | { | | throw new MessagingException(MessagingException.ADDRESS_DOES_NOT_EXIST, | | "Cannot route to address " + address); | | } | | } | | If we route to address a.b.* this obviously doesn't exist as an added address, how do we handle this.# | I think you're misunderstanding how it's supposed to work. You never route a message with a wildcard address, you *subscribe* with a wildcard address. I.e. you create a subscription to com.reuters.newsfeeds.* But messages always get routed to absolute addresses e.g. com.reuters.newsfeeds.uk.sport. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175874#4175874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175874

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Unifying jBPM project lifecycles

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, after internal discussions we came to the conclusion that it would simplify the development cycle of both jbpm3 and 4 a great deal if we would actually talk about these to development branches as such. In Jira, SVN, Maven we would have jbpm-3.3.x and jbpm-4.0.x releases. Both project branches would align their release cycle, so that consumers of these projects can rely on updates in the maven repository approximately every 8 weeks. The distinction between pvm, jpdl4 lifecycle is superfluous because for the foreseeablr future both projects evolve lock step anyway. For jBPM users it will also become easier, because in future you will only need to refer to jbpm-x.y.z without needing to make a distinction in project name based on component. The pvm release artefact in the maven repository will of course stay decoupled as is for folks that only want to consume the pvm base component. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175869#4175869 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175869

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: Handling soft versus hard pooledInvoker exceptions in JR

by ScottMarlowNovell

I'm having difficulties running the clustered unit tests on my Windows laptop. I added two virtual network (loopback) adapters and can run the JGroups draw program with those but the app servers launched from the clustered unit test don't see each other. I want to run the unit tests before my change and again with my changes. I've reviewed the various tips for running on Windows (disable media sense, adding virtual ip addresses). I'll continue to work through this (unless someone can suggest a shorter path?) In local.properties, I specified the virtual ip addresses: node0=169.254.25.130 node1=169.254.25.129 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175863#4175863 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175863

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: PostgeSQL runs take too long

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Where in the config would that be? http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm3/trunk/modules/core/src/main/res... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175861#4175861 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175861

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008