December 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM Development] - Re: jpdl syntax for jms activity

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i would prefer to use tag names to indicate the message type. e.g. use element text for text messages and element map for map messages <jms name="send message" | connectionFactory="ConnectionFactory" | queue="queue/MyQueue"> | <text> | This is the body | </text> | <transition to="wait" /> | </jms> | <jms name="send message" | connectionFactory="ConnectionFactory" | queue="queue/MyQueue"> | <map> | <entry> | <key><string value="one" /></key> | <value><int value="3" /></value> | </entry> | </map> | <transition to="wait" /> | </jms> | Note that with this map, I used the syntax that is already in jpdl for maps. So you can leverage the map parsing and it will be more consistent. <jms name="send message" | connectionFactory="ConnectionFactory" | queue="queue/MyQueue"> | <object expr="#{someObjectExpression}" /> | <transition to="wait" /> | </jms> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269945#4269945 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269945

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AS Development Deployment Framework] - JavaEE namspace deployers

by wolfc

To enable the new Application Component Environment Namespaces I've created a component in Reloaded: jboss-reloaded-naming. [1] With JBNAME-37 [2] the setting up of java:comp itself can be disabled in the naming server itself. AS then needs to delegate this to org.jboss.reloaded.naming.service.NameSpaces. [3] NameSpaces will set up the four namespaces defined in the JavaEE 6 spec. java:global will be a simple LinkRef to the root. java:app, java:module and java:comp will be ObjectFactories return the scoped context based on the current component. [4] For a JavaEE container to be obtain a JavaEEComponent a couple of deployers need to be created. An AppDeployer which will setup java:global/<app-name> and store that Context into a JavaEEApplication. This will be attached to the deployment unit. A ModuleDeployer which creates java:app/<module-name> and again attach it to the deployment unit. A ComponentDeployer which in case of a Web Archive will create a LinkRef to java:module, otherwise it will create a new context. Either LinkRef or Context will be bound under java:module/<component-name>. (Note to self: the <module-name> includes the path structure within the EAR.) After this we can think about setting up a complete JSR-250 injection environment into java:comp via a standalone deployer. 1. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RELOADED-9 2. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBNAME-37 3. http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/reloaded/trun... 4. http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/reloaded/trun... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269944#4269944 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269944

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: jpdl syntax for jms activity

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i think connectionFactory should be connection-factory. we always use dashes instead of camelcase in jpdl. for attribute 'destination', are you sure that you can code for queue's and topics in the same way? if not, you might need different attributes for that. for example replace attribute destination="MyDestination" with queue="myQueue" or topic="MyTopic". to me using attributes queue and topic reads more naturally. what do you think ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269942#4269942 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269942

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - jpdl syntax for jms activity

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: jpdl syntax for ejb method invoke activity

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"Koen" wrote : Do we only target ejb3 or also ejb2 ? I think ejb 3 to get started with in incubation. Then if we get enough requests for ejb 2 we can consider it. If we tackle it later, do you think it could impact the current attributes ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269939#4269939 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269939

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: jpdl syntax for ejb method invoke activity

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

I think the invoking an ejb should be called just 'java' As the java activity actually means invoke a java method. At least, that is the reasoning behind it. Some more questions we need to think about: 1) there is a <jndi jndi-name="..." /> element in the wiring section of jpdl. What is then the most consistent way of naming the jndi element ? In that case the full element specifies only jndi so i don't really know what is the most consistent here. 2) do we need to distinct between session and entity beans ? or can we use reflection to find out ? or maybe that doesn't matter any more in ejb 3 ? i don't know. but if we need to make a distinction in the language between session and entities, we might have to consider attributes like session-ejb-jndi-name and entity-ejb-jndi-name. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269938#4269938 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269938

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - jpdl syntax for ejb method invoke activity

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"Koen" wrote : | | | | | | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269937#4269937 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269937

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Supporting qualifiers in MC

by alesj

On a related note, can you think about how "OSGi like properties" could be used together with your existing qualifiers to limit the injection lookup. e.g. we register OSGi service with property a=b, then at injection point we would also apply this filter | <inject filter="(a=b)"/> | | <inject> | <qualifier type="filter">(a=b)</qualifier> | </inject> | Or something like that ... What I'm interested in is to make this play nicely with qualifiers, so we don't do duplicate work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269929#4269929 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269929

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Supporting qualifiers in MC

by alesj

I wouldn't bother too much. If the user overrides class info or existing MDR info with xml, then that's what we should use. If he wants something more on the plain inject, let him add qualifiers via xml as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269928#4269928 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269928

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Profiler Development] - Re: Beta6 remaining issues

by kukeltje

Ok, could not resist and already took a quick look. It is transactional file handling, only not quite as I'd like it (no offence). This could/should be wrapped in a JCA for the requirements we have and be able to run in CMT. So things like closing the file after the transaction completed (required in this implementation) should be done 'automagically'. http://wernli.nine.ch/web/guest/52 does this already, and 'just' needs some JBoss 'wrappers'. See http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269511#4269511 and http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269883#4269883 (sorry for the fragmentation ;-). If something works, I'll make sure to blog about it. Unfortunately the work on the ui for the profiler has to be postponed to January (also because of this and an important jBPM release) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269903#4269903 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269903

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2009